Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63872
| From | Bayram Güçlü <byrmgcl@yandex.com.tr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Code review? |
| Date | 2014-01-14 11:29 +0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <52D4E774.6090206@yandex.com.tr> (permalink) |
| References | <13BCC15D-B1E0-4AB2-9641-673D5B1B6FDD@gmail.com> <mailman.5433.1389656059.18130.python-list@python.org> <bjk6spFg0vbU2@mid.individual.net> |
On 14-01-2014 11:22, Bob Martin wrote: > in 714500 20140113 233415 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote: >>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:40:25 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> >>>> Incidentally, is there a reason you're using Python 2.6? You should be >>>> able to upgrade at least to 2.7, and Flask ought to work fine on 3.3 >>>> (the current stable Python). If it's the beginning of your project, and >>>> you have nothing binding you to Python 2, go with Python 3. Converting a >>>> small project now will save you the job of converting a big project in >>>> ten years' time >>> >>> Everything you say is correct, but remember that there is a rather large >>> ecosystem of people writing code to run on servers where the supported >>> version of Python is 2.6, 2.5, 2.4 and even 2.3. RedHat, for example, >>> still has at least one version of RHEL still under commercial support >>> where the system Python is 2.3, at least that was the case a few months >>> back, it may have reached end-of-life by now. But 2.4 will definitely >>> still be under support. >> >> Pledging that your app will run on the system Python of RHEL is >> something that binds you to a particular set of versions of Python. >> It's not just library support that does that. > > Does any Linux distro ship with Python 3? I haven't seen one. > Debian GNU/Linux https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3.3
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Code review? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-14 03:40 +1100
Re: Code review? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-13 20:43 +0000
Re: Code review? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-14 10:34 +1100
Re: Code review? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2014-01-14 07:22 +0000
Re: Code review? Bayram Güçlü <byrmgcl@yandex.com.tr> - 2014-01-14 11:29 +0400
Re: Code review? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-14 18:36 +1100
csiph-web