Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43604

Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

From Stefan Schwarzer <sschwarzer@sschwarzer.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names
Date 2013-04-15 07:47 +0200
Organization 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID <516B9478.6020607@sschwarzer.net> (permalink)
References <mailman.607.1365976228.3114.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Chris,

On 2013-04-14 23:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Quirky question time!
> 
> When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
> read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
> it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
> about just one of them:
> 
> ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
> ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
> 
> Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
> its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
> is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?

I think if you _write_ "collections.OrderedDict", the
article you _write_ in front should match this. The phrase
"an collections.OrderedDict" looks odd to me, and if I read
it somewhere, it wouldn't cross my mind that the writer used
"an collections.OrderedDict" with the idea not to pronounce
"collections". ;-) In my opinion, this is too subtle.

On the other hand, when you _speak_ about the ordered dict,
use the article matching what you actually say.

Best regards,
Stefan

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-15 07:50 +1000
  Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Stefan Schwarzer <sschwarzer@sschwarzer.net> - 2013-04-15 07:47 +0200

csiph-web