Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #22105

Re: Stream programming

Date 2012-03-24 01:26 +0100
From Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Stream programming
References <4f6c9e17$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <mailman.934.1332520419.3037.python-list@python.org> <4f6cde28$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <mailman.945.1332537502.3037.python-list@python.org>
Message-ID <4f6d14ca$0$1392$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> (permalink)
Organization TIN.IT (http://www.tin.it)

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/23/2012 22:18, Nathan Rice wrote:
>>>   I understand what
>>> you're trying to communicate, so I think you need to be a little more
>>> strict and explicit in your definitions.
>>
>>
>> No, I don't think you understand what I meant.
>
> I don't agree. Sorry.

You could just point out those inconsistencies that you found.

>> Yes. I thought that streams as an alternative to functional programming were
>> widely known.
>
> Streams aren't really a paradigm of computation.  They're a semantic
> element of a computational system which cuts across paradigms.  If you
> want to retract that and say you were talking about dataflow
> programming (which is much larger than streams, and actually has a
> cohesive definition), I won't hold it against you.

I wasn't talking of dataflow programming. "Flow programming" is much 
closer to functional programming than dataflow programming is.

>> Instead of talking of what I wasn't trying to do and, indeed, I didn't do,
>> you should try to understand what I wanted to do and, in fact, I did.
>> I'm afraid your cup is too full to understand simple things as the one I
>> wrote in my OP.
>
> Clearly, because I didn't explicitly include the possibility that you
> are just writing throwaway code with no attempt at development of
> ideas for the purpose of practicing writing code in the paragraph
> after the one you quoted.

x != 'a' doesn't imply that x == 'b'.

> If your goal is to learn to code, instead of posting a message stating
> that you have a superior way to compose code, you might want to try to
> solve a problem and ask others their opinion of the structure and
> techniques in your code.

Never said it was superior.
We've been talking about readability a lot, haven't we? I was just 
proposing something different.

Kiuhnm

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 17:00 +0100
  Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 17:02 +0100
  Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 12:33 -0400
    Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 21:33 +0100
      Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 17:18 -0400
        Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 01:26 +0100
      Re: Stream programming Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-23 14:12 -0700
        Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 00:57 +0100
  Re: Stream programming MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-03-23 18:00 +0000
  Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 15:23 -0400
    Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 21:44 +0100
  Re: Stream programming Ray Song <emacsray@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 07:32 +0800
    Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 01:41 +0100
  Re: Stream programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-24 03:23 +0000
    Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 12:05 +0100
  Re: Stream programming Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-03-26 11:27 +0200
    Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-26 13:45 +0200

csiph-web