Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22105
| Date | 2012-03-24 01:26 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Stream programming |
| References | <4f6c9e17$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <mailman.934.1332520419.3037.python-list@python.org> <4f6cde28$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <mailman.945.1332537502.3037.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <4f6d14ca$0$1392$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | TIN.IT (http://www.tin.it) |
On 3/23/2012 22:18, Nathan Rice wrote: >>> I understand what >>> you're trying to communicate, so I think you need to be a little more >>> strict and explicit in your definitions. >> >> >> No, I don't think you understand what I meant. > > I don't agree. Sorry. You could just point out those inconsistencies that you found. >> Yes. I thought that streams as an alternative to functional programming were >> widely known. > > Streams aren't really a paradigm of computation. They're a semantic > element of a computational system which cuts across paradigms. If you > want to retract that and say you were talking about dataflow > programming (which is much larger than streams, and actually has a > cohesive definition), I won't hold it against you. I wasn't talking of dataflow programming. "Flow programming" is much closer to functional programming than dataflow programming is. >> Instead of talking of what I wasn't trying to do and, indeed, I didn't do, >> you should try to understand what I wanted to do and, in fact, I did. >> I'm afraid your cup is too full to understand simple things as the one I >> wrote in my OP. > > Clearly, because I didn't explicitly include the possibility that you > are just writing throwaway code with no attempt at development of > ideas for the purpose of practicing writing code in the paragraph > after the one you quoted. x != 'a' doesn't imply that x == 'b'. > If your goal is to learn to code, instead of posting a message stating > that you have a superior way to compose code, you might want to try to > solve a problem and ask others their opinion of the structure and > techniques in your code. Never said it was superior. We've been talking about readability a lot, haven't we? I was just proposing something different. Kiuhnm
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 17:00 +0100
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 17:02 +0100
Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 12:33 -0400
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 17:18 -0400
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 01:26 +0100
Re: Stream programming Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-03-23 14:12 -0700
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 00:57 +0100
Re: Stream programming MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-03-23 18:00 +0000
Re: Stream programming Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 15:23 -0400
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-23 21:44 +0100
Re: Stream programming Ray Song <emacsray@gmail.com> - 2012-03-24 07:32 +0800
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 01:41 +0100
Re: Stream programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-03-24 03:23 +0000
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-24 12:05 +0100
Re: Stream programming Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-03-26 11:27 +0200
Re: Stream programming Kiuhnm <kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it> - 2012-03-26 13:45 +0200
csiph-web