Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #2508

Re: Python CPU

Date 2011-04-03 00:16 -0700
From John Nagle <nagle@animats.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Python CPU
References <01bd055b-631d-45f0-90a7-229da4a9a362@t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <8vps7tF9vuU1@mid.individual.net> <4d97f125$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Message-ID <4d981eb5$0$10581$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> (permalink)
Organization Sonic.Net

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/2/2011 9:01 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> There were also Forth chips, which let you run Forth in hardware. I
> believe they were much faster than Forth in software, but were killed by
> the falling popularity of Forth.

     The Forth chips were cute, and got more done with fewer gates than
almost anything else.  But that didn't matter for long.
Willow Garage has a custom Forth chip they use in their Ethernet
cameras, but it's really a FPGA.

     A tagged machine might make Python faster.  You could have
unboxed ints and floats, yet still allow values of other types,
with the hardware tagging helping with dispatch.   But it probably
wouldn't help all that much.  It didn't in the LISP machines.

					John Nagle

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python CPU Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 08:38 -0700
  Re: Python CPU jkn <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> - 2011-04-01 08:59 -0700
  Re: Python CPU Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-01 17:52 +0100
    Re: Python CPU Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-04-01 19:00 +0200
    Re: Python CPU geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 10:12 -0700
  Re: Python CPU Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2011-04-01 11:28 -0700
  Re: Python CPU Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2011-04-01 11:35 -0700
    Re: Python CPU John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-01 12:18 -0700
  Re: Python CPU "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-04-02 23:06 +0100
    Re: Python CPU Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-03 04:03 +0000
  Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-03 12:10 +1200
    Re: Python CPU Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-03 04:01 +0000
      Re: Python CPU John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-03 00:16 -0700
        Re: Python CPU Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-03 01:59 -0700
          Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-04 19:41 +1200
        Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-04 19:47 +1200
          Re: Python CPU Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-04 02:23 -0700
            Re: Python CPU Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-04 13:14 -0400
            Re: Python CPU Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-04-04 14:58 -0400
              Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-05 09:59 +1200
          Re: Python CPU geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 09:36 -0700
            Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-05 10:05 +1200
          Re: Python CPU John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-04 12:56 -0700
            Re: Python CPU Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-04 13:20 -0700
              Re: Python CPU Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-04-05 10:11 +1200
    Re: Python CPU Werner Thie <werner@thieprojects.ch> - 2011-04-03 17:44 +0200
      Re: Python CPU John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-04-03 10:15 -0700
        Re: Python CPU Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-04-03 22:37 +0100
          Re: Python CPU Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-04-03 22:59 -0700

csiph-web