Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #100714
| X-Received | by 10.129.95.87 with SMTP id t84mr18746142ywb.19.1450748750482; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:45:50 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| X-Received | by 10.50.115.41 with SMTP id jl9mr328847igb.10.1450748750412; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:45:50 -0800 (PST) |
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!94no327983qgt.1!news-out.google.com!l1ni10616igd.0!nntp.google.com!mv3no14263849igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:45:49 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.14.1450671763.2237.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=23.30.65.94; posting-account=h3aEwQoAAACiuqX-oR3gvCVFm8lLHoWj |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 23.30.65.94 |
| References | <56776b9d$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.14.1450671763.2237.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <4b131565-a03e-44e1-9fb3-03efb18cb8f6@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random |
| From | Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 01:45:50 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1436 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3044456937 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:100714 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 10:22:57 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote: > DuckDuckGo doesn't give a result count, so I skipped it. Yahoo search yielded: So why bother to mention it then? Is this another one of your "pikeish" propaganda campaigns?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 14:01 +1100
Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-12-21 14:45 +1100
Re: Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:47 +1100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 15:22 +1100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:57 +1100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 17:45 -0800
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-12-21 09:24 +0100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 10:56 +0100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 21:36 +1100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:53 +0100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:56 +0100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 14:25 +0100
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> - 2015-12-21 07:51 -0600
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 16:40 +0000
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 09:49 -0700
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 17:41 +0000
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 17:09 +0000
Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 09:20 -0800
csiph-web