Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #20090

Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.42!gegeweb.eu!news.le-studio75.com!news.univ-fcomte.fr!not-for-mail
From Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:42:40 +0100
Organization A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Lines 11
Message-ID <4F340590.6090503@gmail.com> (permalink)
References <jguajb$mqe$1@news.albasani.net> <jh0jrb$2lb$1@news.univ-fcomte.fr> <mailman.5589.1328798215.27778.python-list@python.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host 172.20.64.17
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.univ-fcomte.fr 1328809654 3456 172.20.64.17 (9 Feb 2012 17:47:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To news@news.univ-fcomte.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:47:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc python-list@python.org
To Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
In-Reply-To <mailman.5589.1328798215.27778.python-list@python.org>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20090

Show key headers only | View raw

>>  This is not 100% an answer to the question, but you should read that :
>>  http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
>
> The OP mentions PEP 8 in the bit of his message that you *don't* quote.

Well... I've to sleep. Sorry :(

Laurent

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question) HoneyMonster <someone@someplace.invalid> - 2012-02-08 17:15 +0000
  Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question) Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-02-08 09:49 -0800
  Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question) Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 15:00 +0100
    Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question) Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 14:36 +0000
      Re: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question) Laurent Claessens <moky.math@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 18:42 +0100
      Apparent "double imports" (was: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)) HoneyMonster <someone@someplace.invalid> - 2012-02-09 18:53 +0000
        Re: Apparent "double imports" (was: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 12:02 -0700
          Re: Apparent "double imports" (was: Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)) HoneyMonster <someone@someplace.invalid> - 2012-02-09 19:40 +0000
            Re: Apparent "double imports" Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-02-09 15:05 -0500
              Re: Apparent "double imports" HoneyMonster <someone@someplace.invalid> - 2012-02-09 21:57 +0000

csiph-web