Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #2759
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? |
| Date | Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:01:39 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <4D9D6F63.9080004@v.loewis.de> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.62.1302055157.9059.python-list@python.org> <inij0j$v6v$1@online.de> <mailman.91.1302134778.9059.python-list@python.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | port-92-206-213-187.dynamic.qsc.de |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | online.de 1302163299 9124 92.206.213.187 (7 Apr 2011 08:01:39 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@einsundeins.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:01:39 +0000 (UTC) |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| To | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11 |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.91.1302134778.9059.python-list@python.org> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:2759 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 07.04.2011 02:06, schrieb Chris Angelico: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Martin v. Loewis <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> You can adjust the implementations of PyMem_Malloc and PyObject_Malloc. >> This would catch many allocations, but not all of them. If you adjust >> PyMem_MALLOC instead of PyMem_Malloc, you catch even more allocations - >> but extensions modules which directly call malloc() still would bypass >> this accounting. > > I'm not too concerned about extensions, here; in any case, I lock most > of them off. I just want to prevent stupid stuff like this: > > a='a' > while True: > a+=a That would certainly be caught by instrumenting PyObject_MALLOC. More generally, I believe that if you instrument the functions I mentioned, your use case is likely covered. Regards, Martin
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sandboxed Python: memory limits? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 11:59 +1000
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> - 2011-04-06 22:38 +0200
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 10:06 +1000
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> - 2011-04-07 10:01 +0200
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> - 2011-04-07 10:01 +0200
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? David Bolen <db3l.net@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 14:36 -0400
Re: Sandboxed Python: memory limits? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 04:59 +1000
csiph-web