Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #98930

Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files

X-Received by 10.182.29.41 with SMTP id g9mr37366998obh.27.1447774310777; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:31:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received by 10.50.6.40 with SMTP id x8mr67226igx.0.1447774310758; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Path csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!i2no4281498igv.0!news-out.google.com!l1ni566igd.0!nntp.google.com!i2no4281497igv.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:31:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <mailman.392.1447773612.16136.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.249.183.252; posting-account=ZxV-SgoAAADbox0Kt5vMsxYlC8niBQCt
NNTP-Posting-Host 195.249.183.252
References <463ad93c-0186-4911-9cd1-92d97b9dc87b@googlegroups.com> <mailman.387.1447769670.16136.python-list@python.org> <54330891-6568-4469-93ae-7a7825961500@googlegroups.com> <mailman.392.1447773612.16136.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Message-ID <420ec4e9-6af6-49bd-a9f4-8b47ef1f136e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files
From andrea.gavana@gmail.com
Injection-Date Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:31:50 +0000
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:98930

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Chris,

On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 4:20:34 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:20 AM,  Andrea Gavana wrote:
> > Thank you for your answer. I do get similar timings when I swap the two functions, and specifically still 15 seconds to read the file via file.read() and 2.4 seconds (more or less as before) via cPickle.load(fid).
> >
> > I thought that the order of operations might be an issue but apparently that was not the case...
> 
> What if you call one of them twice and then the other? Just trying to
> rule out any possibility that it's a caching problem.
> 
> On my Linux box, running 2.7.9 64-bit, the two operations take roughly
> the same amount of time (1.8 seconds for load vs 1s to read and 0.8 to
> loads). Are you able to run this off a RAM disk or something?
> 
> Most curious.


Thank you for taking the time to run my little script. I have now run it with multiple combinations of calls (twice the first then the other, then viceversa, then alternate between the two functions multiple times, then three times the second and once the first, ...) with no luck at all.

The file.read() line of code takes always at minimum 14 seconds (in all the trials I have done), while the cPickle.load call ranges between 2.3 and 2.5 seconds.

I am puzzled with no end... Might there be something funny with my C libraries that use fread? I'm just shooting in the dark. I have a standard Python installation on Windows, nothing fancy :-( 

Andrea.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files andrea.gavana@gmail.com - 2015-11-17 05:26 -0800
  Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-11-17 15:14 +0100
    Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files andrea.gavana@gmail.com - 2015-11-17 06:20 -0800
      Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 02:20 +1100
        Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files andrea.gavana@gmail.com - 2015-11-17 07:31 -0800
          Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-11-17 16:57 +0100
            Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files andrea.gavana@gmail.com - 2015-11-17 08:31 -0800
              Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-11-17 18:20 +0100
          Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2015-11-18 10:00 +0100
            Re: cPickle.load vs. file.read+cPickle.loads on large binary files andrea.gavana@gmail.com - 2015-11-18 02:31 -0800

csiph-web