Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #88241
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 19:57 -0700 |
| References | <55168340$0$12999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <cssdha1j7j1ejir0itl5s37ou2eiidr1fj@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <35890a6a-1eef-43cd-8baa-e61a3aa191f4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Python 2/3 versus Perl 5/6 |
| From | Sayth <flebber.crue@gmail.com> |
Perl 6 tried to acheive to much, and by delay and confusion lost the enthusiasm of the community behind it Perl 6 and the at that time robust Perl 5 community who saw it as the future, when that future waned so did their's. Perl 6 should have just done what the community wanted at that time, introduce class::mop for a proper oop implementation abs tidy a few edge cases and pull in a few key modules into core. They would now be talking Perl 7 and how to implement functional design into the new release with a larger community. It would be interesting to see how Ruby would have progressed of Perl hadn't stuffed progress up so badly. To me Ruby has always looked like a tidy Perl.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python 2/3 versus Perl 5/6 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-28 21:32 +1100
Re: Python 2/3 versus Perl 5/6 Mario Figueiredo <marfig@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 20:36 +0100
Re: Python 2/3 versus Perl 5/6 Sayth <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:57 -0700
Re: Python 2/3 versus Perl 5/6 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-29 22:59 +1100
csiph-web