Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8426
| From | Harold <dadapapa@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Significant figures calculation |
| Date | 2011-06-24 18:50 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <218ee71c-ba06-4e94-aaac-c87b44cce554@5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10b8388e-76fc-4a93-aeff-676cdb3d1d12@5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4e04f793$0$29975$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
> > I tried to modify the DecimalContext (e.g. getcontext().prec = 2) but > > that did not lead to the correct behavior. > > Really? It works for me. You are right, I did something wrong when attempting to set the precision. And the trick with rounding the decimal with the unary + is neat. It's the first time for me to play with decimals, so bare with me if I miss the obvious. However, this approach forces you to know the number of significant figures beforehand -- which is precisely what the arithmetics should do for you. What would indeed be nice, is Jerry's suggestion to obtain the number of significant bits and write a small wrapper around the number protocoll implementation that accounts significance and have __str__/__repr__ set the context dynamically. I haven't seen anything obvious in the docs, though it might be possible to use log10 of the length of some normalized string representation.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Significant figures calculation Harold <dadapapa@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-24 13:05 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-24 20:46 +0000
Re: Significant figures calculation Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2011-06-24 16:58 -0400
Re: Significant figures calculation steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info - 2011-06-25 10:31 +1000
Re: Significant figures calculation Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-06-25 19:04 +0000
Re: Significant figures calculation Harold <dadapapa@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-26 08:35 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-06-27 08:04 -0400
Re: Significant figures calculation Harold <dadapapa@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-27 06:40 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-27 13:53 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-28 12:56 +1000
Re: Significant figures calculation Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 13:16 +1000
Re: Significant figures calculation Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-06-27 20:45 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-28 07:47 -0400
Re: Significant figures calculation Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 21:57 +1000
Re: Significant figures calculation Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-06-28 11:54 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-28 16:47 -0400
Re: Significant figures calculation Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-06-28 14:01 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-28 18:35 +1000
Re: Significant figures calculation Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-06-28 11:59 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-06-27 20:49 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-27 15:58 -0700
Re: Significant figures calculation Harold <dadapapa@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-24 18:50 -0700
csiph-web