Re: scalar vs array and program control

Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: scalar vs array and program control
Date	Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:35:53 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines	33
Message-ID	<2035096.cBO6vpb5vr@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	<87vbd850qa.fsf@gmail.com> <mailman.973.1437822101.3674.python-list@python.org> <1619647.1FW7hyz6Jq@PointedEars.de> <mailman.978.1437831852.3674.python-list@python.org> <1757573.rN60lcJNyZ@PointedEars.de> <mailman.989.1437846349.3674.python-list@python.org> <1852361.ZT26voajJO@PointedEars.de>
Reply-To	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
X-Trace	solani.org 1437907159 336 eJwNxcEBwCAIA8CVqhCEcUIs+4/Q3udgsULHA+EYDDXaeh12xeLG6cXsfGyrTMHkHf45snriAzo5EfE= (26 Jul 2015 10:39:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID	eJwNy8kBwCAMA7CVcjowDsRk/xFa/ZUORVcgETk5ITDi8tznJYMeMLtUpWm7Tz/WFVrlCzEtj801Unv452UfaKIVwg==
Cancel-Lock	sha1:vHWpBUN4vlpRiRtowAVGJPYY3EY=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVIvxjnCL2H6F3UArbjaBhsXaIHTeZ0tLHuJHaha4zS233ZQmiE5TJ7wcZJxEQ
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:94617

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> Laura Creighton wrote:
>> and to create a class where none was before to make it more object-
>> oriented.
> 
> I did not need to, but, again, it was more obvious that way.  I could also
> have used an existing class, and its existing or newly added method. 
> AISB, almost everything in Python is an object; therefore, almost
> everything in Python has a class (try “print((42)).__class__)” in Py3k). 
                                                   ^
> […]

| >>> print((42).__class__)
| <class 'int'>

Most interesting (but understandable):

| >>> print(42..__class__)
| <class 'float'>

BTW, another common misconception that I read from your argument is that 
“object-oriented” would be synonymous with “class-based”; that one needs a 
class for OOP.  In fact, however, there are several object-oriented 
programming languages, again for example most ECMAScript implementations, 
that are prototype-based: one object/instance inherits from another, its 
prototype.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: scalar vs array and program control Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-25 13:01 +0200
  Re: scalar vs array and program control Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-25 14:57 +0200
    Re: scalar vs array and program control Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-25 15:43 +0200
      Re: scalar vs array and program control Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-25 18:53 +0200
        Re: scalar vs array and program control Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-25 18:56 +0200
        Re: scalar vs array and program control Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-25 19:45 +0200
          Re: scalar vs array and program control Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-26 12:26 +0200
            Re: scalar vs array and program control Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-07-26 12:35 +0200

csiph-web