Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56315
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-07 09:26 -0700 |
| References | <5783f76c-5565-4089-a6d5-accb0bf329c0@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <1d56b6ac-e3ee-4a5e-8d58-dfdaa998b7cc@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance |
| From | John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> |
Thanks, everyone, for your replies. Perhaps I have complicated things unnecessarily? I was just trying to do some error-checking on the arguments supplied to the class constructor. Perhaps Python already implements automatically what I am trying to accomplish manually? I'll tinker around with some minimal code, try to provoke some errors, and see what I get. Here is one more detail which may be relevant. The base class for the family of classes I am developing is a numpy.ndarray. The numpy.ndarray is a C extension type (and if I understand correctly, that means it is immutable by ordinary Python methods). Subclassing ndarray can get a bit complicated (see http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/basics.subclassing.html). The ndarray.__init__ method is inaccessible, instead one overrides ndarray.__new__. Making further subclasses of a subclassed numpy.ndarray, each of which may have their own arguments, is what I am trying to accomplish while adhering to the "DRY" principle.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-05 21:04 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-10-06 09:25 +0200
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-06 14:34 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-07 02:43 +0000
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-10-07 08:52 -0500
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-07 09:26 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-07 09:42 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-07 21:13 +0000
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-10-07 14:49 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-07 14:12 -0700
Re: Variable arguments (*args, **kwargs): seeking elegance Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacioppi@gmail.com> - 2013-10-08 01:30 -0700
csiph-web