Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #88084

Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?
Date 2015-03-26 19:54 +0100
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <1823599.Pr2V0MPR6q@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <mailman.52.1426997516.10327.python-list@python.org> <1504323.jUKfeKbQsP@PointedEars.de> <mailman.181.1427346636.10327.python-list@python.org> <2362875.FIK8ImHTJA@PointedEars.de> <mailman.211.1427394586.10327.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Ian Kelly wrote:

> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote:
>> Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> What the grammar that you quoted from shows is that STRING+ is an
>>> expression. The individual STRINGs of a STRING+ are not expressions,
>>> except to the extent that they can be parsed in isolation as a
>>> STRING+.
>> How did you get that idea?  STRING+ means one or more consecutive STRING
>> tokens (ignoring whitespace in-between), which means one or more
>> consecutive string literals.  A (single) string literal definitely is an 
>> expression as it can be produced with the “expr” goal symbol of the 
>> Python grammar (given there in a flavor of EBNF).
> 
> Yes, that's what I was referring to in my parenthetical "except..." above.

Your “except” is contradictory to the rest of what you said, at best.

> What I mean is that if you construct a parse tree of "foo" "bar" using
> that grammar, it looks like this:
> 
>      expr
>        |
>     STRING+
>      /   \
> STRING  STRING
> […]
> 
> There is only one expr node, and it contains both STRING tokens.

Prove it.

But be warned: Neither would prove that a string literal is not an 
expression.  Because you did not consider the most simple variant of an AST 
(or subtree) according to this grammar:

    expr
     |
   STRING

Again, “STRING+” does _not_ mean “STRING STRING STRING*”; it means “STRING 
STRING*”.  The second and following STRINGs are *optional*.

>> […] in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol
>> clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately
>> preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*.
> 
> It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals.

Utter nonsense.  Have you ever written a parser?  (I have.)  A literal *is* 
a token.  Whether two consecutive tokens end up as the same *node* in an AST 
is a *different* issue (that, again, was _not_ debated).
 
 
-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Aditya Raj Bhatt <adityarajbhatt@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 10:46 -0700
  Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Laurent Pointal <laurent.pointal@laposte.net> - 2015-03-18 19:04 +0100
    Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Laurent Pointal <laurent.pointal@laposte.net> - 2015-03-18 19:06 +0100
      Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-18 20:53 +0100
        Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-18 20:56 +0100
        Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-03-18 17:47 -0400
        Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-19 09:58 +1100
          Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-19 10:23 +1100
    Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Aditya Raj Bhatt <adityarajbhatt@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 11:23 -0700
      Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> - 2015-03-18 14:45 -0400
      Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Laurent Pointal <laurent.pointal@laposte.net> - 2015-03-18 20:08 +0100
      Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2015-03-28 16:34 -0700
  Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-18 21:21 +0100
  Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-03-18 13:15 -0500
  Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-19 11:06 +1100
  Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-03-19 00:53 +0000
    Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-22 04:14 +0100
      Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 14:36 +1100
        Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-22 04:49 +0100
          Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 15:11 +1100
            Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 05:35 +0100
              Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 23:09 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 17:45 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 12:29 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 19:54 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 17:27 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-28 19:20 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 01:56 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-29 12:41 +0200
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 01:23 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 16:10 -0700
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:36 +1100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 17:43 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-04-02 23:31 +0200
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-04-02 15:26 -0700
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 18:21 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-04-03 16:40 +1100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 16:57 +1100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-04-03 10:13 +0300
                r"\"" ??? (was A simple single line, triple-quoted comment) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 05:52 -0700
                Re: r"\"" ??? (was A simple single line, triple-quoted comment) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 01:40 +1100
                Re: r"\"" ??? (was A simple single line, triple-quoted comment) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 08:14 -0700
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:25 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 00:40 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax   error. Why? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-03-27 11:43 +1300
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-28 19:06 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 12:32 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 19:56 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-27 10:15 +1100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-03-26 18:47 -0500
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 19:38 -0600
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-27 07:34 +0200
              Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-26 01:23 -0400
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 18:25 +0100
                Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-03-26 18:30 +0100
          Re: A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-22 12:00 +0200

csiph-web