Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #98733
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 00:57 -0800 |
| References | <ecc7eec6-3298-4f80-9bfb-eeecd3eeeb3a@googlegroups.com> <mailman.280.1447365421.16136.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <11344ffd-f594-4059-8c41-6bacbdb66f10@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? |
| From | PythonDude <mjoerg.phone@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, 12 November 2015 22:57:21 UTC+1, Robert Kern wrote: > On 2015-11-12 15:57, PythonDude wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've come around a webpage with python-tutorial/description for obtaining something and I'll solve this: > > > > R = p^T w > > > > where R is a vector and p^T is the transpose of another vector. > > > > ... > > p is a Nx1 column vector, so p^T turns into a 1xN row vector which can be multiplied with the > > Nx1 weight (column) vector w to give a scalar result. This is equivalent to the dot > > product used in the code. Keep in mind that Python has a reversed definition of > > rows and columns and the accurate NumPy version of the previous equation would > > be R = w * p.T > > ... > > > > (source: http://blog.quantopian.com/markowitz-portfolio-optimization-2/ ) > > > > I don't understand this: "Keep in mind that Python has a reversed definition of > > rows and columns and the accurate NumPy version of the previous equation would > > be R = w * p.T" > > > > Not true for numpy, is it? This page: http://mathesaurus.sourceforge.net/matlab-numpy.html says it python and matlab looks quite similar... > > > > Anyone could please explain or elaborate on exactly this (quote): "Keep in mind that Python has a reversed definition of rows and columns"??? > > He's wrong, simply put. There is no "reversed definition of rows and columns". Great, thank... > He simply instantiated the two vectors as row-vectors instead of column-vectors, > which he could have easily done, so he had to flip the matrix expression. Thank you very much Robert - I just had to be sure about it :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? PythonDude <mjoerg.phone@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 07:57 -0800
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 09:34 -0700
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? PythonDude <mjoerg.phone@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 00:56 -0800
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 21:56 +0000
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? PythonDude <mjoerg.phone@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 00:57 -0800
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? Dave Farrance <df@see.replyto.invalid> - 2015-11-13 16:35 +0000
Re: don't understand matrix-multiplication should be reversed in python? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-11-14 13:12 +1300
csiph-web