Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21958
| From | Paul Doyle <paul@fabric-engine.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Fabric Engine v1.0 released under AGPL |
| Date | 2012-03-20 15:24 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <0c86f051-e519-4638-9914-110ea02a75a8@db5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <549b3a51-5bd9-4ea1-aae0-8f7b09206046@tx8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jkap9h$htk$1@theodyn.ncf.ca> |
Hi Colin, Fabric supports multi-dimensional arrays, and also provides support for dictionaries. You can read more here: http://documentation.fabric-engine.com/latest/FabricEngine-KLProgrammingGuide.html In terms of comparison to Numpy - I'm not familiar with that product, but some surface level similarities/differences: - we don't provide high-level functions for scientific computing. This is something we're looking at now. - both products provide methods for including existing libraries (http://documentation.fabric-engine.com/latest/FabricEngine- ExtensionsReference.html) - Fabric is a high-performance framework - http://documentation.fabric-engine.com/latest/FabricEngine-Overview.html - we haven't benchmarked against R, MatLab etc but we run at the same speed as multi-threaded compiled code (since that's essentially what we're doing). Hope that helps, Paul > > It seems that sing;e dimension arrays are used in KL. How does this > compare with Numpy? > > Colin W.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fabric Engine v1.0 released under AGPL Fabric Paul <technovegas@gmail.com> - 2012-03-20 09:51 -0700
Re: Fabric Engine v1.0 released under AGPL "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2012-03-20 16:28 -0400
Re: Fabric Engine v1.0 released under AGPL Paul Doyle <paul@fabric-engine.com> - 2012-03-20 15:24 -0700
csiph-web