Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1078 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-11-25 12:21 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-11-26 18:48 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.postscript
Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-25 12:21 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-25 19:50 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-25 22:12 +0100
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? "luser.droog" <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 08:46 -0600
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 08:25 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 15:31 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 09:32 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2012-11-26 16:24 +0100
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 09:53 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 18:21 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 11:26 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 18:34 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 13:56 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 21:10 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 17:23 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2012-11-26 18:47 -0600
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 18:45 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? "luser.droog" <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-27 23:54 -0600
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-18 23:16 -0800
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-27 08:01 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-27 08:04 +0000
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> - 2012-11-26 11:38 -0700
Re: Ghostscript == line limit? Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 18:48 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-27 08:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Rr_ss.192845$kX.7497@fx18.am4> |
| In reply to | #1109 |
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:23:50 -0700, Don Lancaster wrote: > > What is the format for extending the command prompt scrolling window? It's hard coded in the source, you'd need to change the source and rebuild. Like I said, I just isn't a type of use for which the windowing app was designed. Chris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-27 08:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Du_ss.192846$kX.69399@fx18.am4> |
| In reply to | #1112 |
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:01:53 +0000, Chris wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:23:50 -0700, Don Lancaster wrote: > > >> What is the format for extending the command prompt scrolling window? > > It's hard coded in the source, you'd need to change the source and > rebuild. > > Like I said, I just isn't a type of use for which the windowing app was > designed. > > Chris Oops, sorry, I misread the question.....too early in the morning, here! Chris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-26 11:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ahhr9uF10jqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1097 |
On 11/26/2012 11:26 AM, Don Lancaster wrote: > On 11/26/2012 11:21 AM, Chris wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:53:45 -0700, Don Lancaster wrote: >> >>> On 11/26/2012 8:24 AM, Helge Blischke wrote: >>> >>> If I put a very long time delay in the loop, the program faithfully >>> reports one line at a time, but the final display only shows the last 82 >>> results. The others scroll gone. >>> >>> The key question is whether anyone else can duplicate this with >>> GhostScript and Windows 8. >> >> I don't think there is any problem here, and certainly nothing specific >> to Windows 8. >> >> It's simply that the size of the scroll buffer for the gswin32.exe/ >> gswin64.exe window is ~80 lines. >> >> If backchannel data like this is important to you, you might consider >> running gswin32c.exe/gswin64c.exe in a command prompt window instead. >> Then you can set the scroll buffer to the size you want. >> >> Chris >> > > This sounds like the problem. > > Is there a way to put a PostScript command INSIDE a program that alters > the scroll buffer size on the fly? > > > Strangely, the 82 line limit seems to be independent of how many characters are in each individual line. The underlying program need that discovered the problem had about 60 characters per line; it too stopped at 82 lines. -- Many thanks, Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073 Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-26 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <LPOss.381285$nB6.144683@fx21.am4> |
| In reply to | #1099 |
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:38:49 -0700, Don Lancaster wrote: > > Strangely, the 82 line limit seems to be independent of how many > characters are in each individual line. > > The underlying program need that discovered the problem had about 60 > characters per line; it too stopped at 82 lines. Not strange: the length of the buffered lines, and the number of buffered lines are independent settings. It's not just a setting of so many bytes for the entire scroll buffer. Chris
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.postscript
csiph-web