Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3582
| From | Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript |
| Date | 2020-10-05 06:26 +0000 |
| Organization | Some absurd concept |
| Message-ID | <eli$2010050225@qaz.wtf> (permalink) |
| References | <d70ed1c6-db8e-4dd4-969a-ca9ea7bfb02fn@googlegroups.com> |
In comp.lang.postscript, jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mac font Calibri has glyphs for old-style numbers. Mac Font Book
> claims that they are glyphs 954 to 963, it not being obvious what
> those numbers mean. Best efforts with glyph names resembling
> /oneoldstyle, …, /threeoldstyle, …, produce the notdef block. :-(
>
> Please, how can these non-Unicode glyphs be accessed from PostScript?
I'm not enough of a Postscript expert to help here, but such glyphs have
a bunch of names:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_figures
Text figures (also known as non-lining, lowercase, old style,[1]
ranging, hanging, medieval, billing,[2] or antique[3] figures or
numerals) are numerals designed with varying heights in a fashion
that resembles a typical line of running text, hence the name. They
are contrasted with lining figures (also called titling or modern
figures), which are the same height as upper-case letters.[4][5]
Georgia is an example of a popular typeface that employs text
figures by default.
I generally think of them as "lower case" numbers, and would hunt using
names like that.
Elijah
------
found that wikipedia page using "lower case numbers" as the search
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-04 13:14 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2020-10-05 06:26 +0000
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 00:33 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:00 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:02 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-10-05 08:05 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:13 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-07 11:16 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-07 13:51 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-10-09 08:48 +0100
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 09:27 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 14:02 -0700
Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 14:53 -0700
csiph-web