Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3582

Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript

From Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Subject Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript
Date 2020-10-05 06:26 +0000
Organization Some absurd concept
Message-ID <eli$2010050225@qaz.wtf> (permalink)
References <d70ed1c6-db8e-4dd4-969a-ca9ea7bfb02fn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.lang.postscript, jdaw1  <jdawiseman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mac font Calibri has glyphs for old-style numbers. Mac Font Book
> claims that they are glyphs 954 to 963, it not being obvious what
> those numbers mean. Best efforts with glyph names resembling
> /oneoldstyle, …, /threeoldstyle, …, produce the notdef block. :-( 
> 
> Please, how can these non-Unicode glyphs be accessed from PostScript?

I'm not enough of a Postscript expert to help here, but such glyphs have
a bunch of names:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_figures

    Text figures (also known as non-lining, lowercase, old style,[1]
    ranging, hanging, medieval, billing,[2] or antique[3] figures or
    numerals) are numerals designed with varying heights in a fashion
    that resembles a typical line of running text, hence the name. They
    are contrasted with lining figures (also called titling or modern
    figures), which are the same height as upper-case letters.[4][5]
    Georgia is an example of a popular typeface that employs text
    figures by default. 

I generally think of them as "lower case" numbers, and would hunt using
names like that.

Elijah
------
found that wikipedia page using "lower case numbers" as the search

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-04 13:14 -0700
  Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2020-10-05 06:26 +0000
    Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 00:33 -0700
      Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:00 -0700
        Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:02 -0700
  Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-10-05 08:05 -0700
    Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2020-10-05 08:13 -0700
      Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-07 11:16 -0700
        Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-07 13:51 -0700
          Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2020-10-09 08:48 +0100
          Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 09:27 -0700
            Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 14:02 -0700
              Re: Old-style numbers, from PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2020-10-09 14:53 -0700

csiph-web