Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3831

encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller

Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Date 2023-02-21 13:26 -0800
Message-ID <cdc04d05-9855-40e1-8dde-9c26dafe89c7n@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller
From douglas mcallaster <douglas.mcallaster@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Folks,

The encoding vectors for fonts are different in Adobe and Ghostscript.
I ran this postscript on Adobe (Distiller) and then Ghostscript:
/LucidaBright 12 selectfont
currentfont 
/FontName get =
currentfont 
/Encoding get
dup
type =
{=} forall

Below are a couple of the many differences in the returned vector:
(1) bullet is not in the GS vector 
(2) germandbls is in both vectors but in position 224 in GS and 252 in Abobe 

I thougth the above postscript code would read the vector from the font itself.
Thus, I expected the same vector from either distiller and GS.

Is there a way to get the same vector?
Otherwise, using the (octal) position code to show a glyph will return different glyph if the postscript is run under GS verses Adobe Distiller.

Thx, Doug 

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller douglas mcallaster <douglas.mcallaster@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 13:26 -0800
  Re: encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2023-02-22 08:25 +0000

csiph-web