Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3831
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-21 13:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cdc04d05-9855-40e1-8dde-9c26dafe89c7n@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller |
| From | douglas mcallaster <douglas.mcallaster@gmail.com> |
Folks,
The encoding vectors for fonts are different in Adobe and Ghostscript.
I ran this postscript on Adobe (Distiller) and then Ghostscript:
/LucidaBright 12 selectfont
currentfont
/FontName get =
currentfont
/Encoding get
dup
type =
{=} forall
Below are a couple of the many differences in the returned vector:
(1) bullet is not in the GS vector
(2) germandbls is in both vectors but in position 224 in GS and 252 in Abobe
I thougth the above postscript code would read the vector from the font itself.
Thus, I expected the same vector from either distiller and GS.
Is there a way to get the same vector?
Otherwise, using the (octal) position code to show a glyph will return different glyph if the postscript is run under GS verses Adobe Distiller.
Thx, Doug
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller douglas mcallaster <douglas.mcallaster@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 13:26 -0800 Re: encoding vectors: different ones returned from GS vs Adobe Distiller ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2023-02-22 08:25 +0000
csiph-web