Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3476
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Omit a color |
| Date | 2019-11-28 09:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3849aa7584eb87629898aa@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <5631c8cb-807a-4453-913d-96f47acf6ce4@googlegroups.com> <0ef2a848-6049-46b6-8305-998ae87d8942@googlegroups.com> <MPG.3848449f367c6859898a9@usenet.plus.net> <0278a83e-9e2e-4497-bbdd-9dcb438286c2@googlegroups.com> |
In article <0278a83e-9e2e-4497-bbdd-9dcb438286c2@googlegroups.com>, news@ademmler.com says... > > Dear Ken, > > thx for your very detailed explanation. This explains a lot. > You are right about the color names - has been a typo from copy paste. > I was playing with ghostscript using this command. > > gs -sDEVICE=tiffsep -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sOutputFile=test.tiff -r50 -csetcolor.ps -f test.pdf > > While setcolor.ps contains: > << > /Separations true > /Setoverprint true > /ProcessColorModel /DeviceCMYK > /SeparationColorNames [ /Black /Spot ] /SeparationOrder [ /Black /Spot ] > >> setpagedevice > > I still get all colors as separations C +M + Y + K + Spot > > Any idea what I am doing wrong here? Nothing. There isn't anything in the PostScript Language which says you can force the device not to produce the Process Color Model colourants. If you look at page 437 onwards in the PLRM it basically says that the ProcessColorModel colourants are always available and the SeparationColorNames parameter declares the names of *additional* spot colourants. So in your case the ProcessColorModel is DeviceCMYK and you have defined an additional colourant of /Spot. The result is that you get CMYK+Spot plates. The *only* device colour model which does not imply a ProcessColorModel is DeviceN. Ghostscript does have a devicen device and that will, broadly, behave in the manner you want I think. But its really intended as a demonstration/test harness, not for actual production. The output format of the colourants is 'bit' which is probably not useful. Also my experimentation with this device doesn't seem to produce anything useful with DeviceN. Its not my specialist subject so I could be doign something wrong. However, I don't really see the problem, if you're using Ghostscript to produce plates, just ignore the ones you don't want. If you're using Ghostscript just to test out PostScript you intend to send to another RIP then I'm afraid you are out of luck, you're in device-dependent behaviour here, and what Ghostscript chooses to do won't reflect what another device might choose to do. Perhaps it would help if you could explain *why* you want to only produce certain plates. Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Omit a color MrDemmler <news@ademmler.com> - 2019-11-26 13:14 -0800
Re: Omit a color MrDemmler <news@ademmler.com> - 2019-11-26 13:28 -0800
Re: Omit a color ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2019-11-27 08:31 +0000
Re: Omit a color MrDemmler <news@ademmler.com> - 2019-11-27 09:25 -0800
Re: Omit a color ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2019-11-28 09:58 +0000
Re: Omit a color ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2019-11-27 08:26 +0000
csiph-web