Re: gs 'exploit'?

From	ken <ken@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.postscript
Subject	Re: gs 'exploit'?
Date	2019-09-18 15:19 +0100
Message-ID	<MPG.37ec4d38f2e54f6a9898a4@usenet.plus.net> (permalink)
References	<76a128e3-b068-4071-9e7c-b32340144cf3@googlegroups.com> <b8cfeca4-846f-4996-97a0-567beba0a7ec@googlegroups.com> <bee1f452-c660-4deb-b86c-5bc76a608ef6@googlegroups.com> <MPG.37e9462e7342f7579898a3@usenet.plus.net> <0f031aa2-0c37-4f5e-9784-edc7a736bff7@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <0f031aa2-0c37-4f5e-9784-edc7a736bff7@googlegroups.com>, 
luser.droog@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 2:12:44 AM UTC-5, ken wrote:
> 
> > Apologies for the slow response, I've been on vacation.
> > 
> > 
> > 				Ken
> 
> No problem, thanks for the info. I realize now that I ought to
> have emailed you directly just in case this was sensitive.

Its a public disclosure so it can't really be sensitive :-)

There's a CVE for it somewhere, but I can't recall the number offhand


		Ken

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

gs 'exploit'? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 15:02 -0700
  Re: gs 'exploit'? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 20:17 -0700
    Re: gs 'exploit'? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-09-09 20:20 -0700
      Re: gs 'exploit'? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2019-09-16 08:12 +0100
        Re: gs 'exploit'? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-09-17 12:22 -0700
          Re: gs 'exploit'? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2019-09-18 15:19 +0100
            Re: gs 'exploit'? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-10-13 02:14 -0700

csiph-web