Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3248
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:54:59 -0500 |
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: gs extension to relax access rules? |
| Date | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:54:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3522a988cf82ac98989929@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <c94cbcf0-df12-4a9c-95a5-16b7c1487f49@googlegroups.com> |
| Reply-To | ken@spamcop.net |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| User-Agent | MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 180325-0, 25/03/2018), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 26 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-1dOWH6V9Wnua72AMB4cTxVP0ByKkGhmM2E82nRCwocQrk/m1KRg9gZAHet9Ja3BfM5bpxZrwh5BYjYY!ivsxUATy0wvv6cFMeGfnFAU2gWXkm38vTasniC5IAco2BrftJ0xIiaCq6CvbNEgTRwy9hsQaFv0T!QjExNvKUi1aUuA== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2175 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.postscript:3248 |
Show key headers only | View raw
In article <c94cbcf0-df12-4a9c-95a5-16b7c1487f49@googlegroups.com>, luser.droog@gmail.com says... > I'm able to get the StdVW array out of the Private > dictionary, but the array itself appears to have > no access. '0 get' failed which tells me it does > not have read access. And 'cvx exec' failed which > tells me it does not have exec access either. Font dictionaries are often created as 'no access' specifically to prevent trivial theft of fonts, its a copyright protection thing. The font interpreter can (internally) ignore such restrictions of course, it only affects the PostScript world. > Is there any workaround I can use to persuade gs > to crack this array for me? I can't really answer that, because it would be technically illegal to disclose a means to circumvent copyright protection measures. Of course, Ghostscript is open source software, so clearly its possible to modify it in such a way as to ignore no access restrictions, as well as other methods for extracting the information you want. Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
gs extension to relax access rules? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-24 10:05 -0700
Re: gs extension to relax access rules? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2018-03-26 07:54 +0100
Re: gs extension to relax access rules? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 15:00 -0700
csiph-web