Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #805
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? |
| Date | 2012-07-16 11:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2a6dfa2e26fb85ed989890@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <CL-dne2qwa15Q57NnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
In article <CL-dne2qwa15Q57NnZ2dnUVZ7o-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim says... > This is (in fact) just the output of the pwwrite driver in GS. That's because ps2pdf is just a script that calls Ghostscript. > The older driver generated stuff like this > > %!PS-Adobe-3.0 > %%Pages: (atend) > %%BoundingBox: 0 0 90 85 > %%HiResBoundingBox: 0.000000 0.000000 90.000000 85.000000 > %............................................. > %%Creator: GPL Ghostscript 900 (pswrite) > %%CreationDate: 2012/07/16 10:18:24 > %%DocumentData: Clean7Bit > %%LanguageLevel: 2 > %%EndComments > > The newer driver: > > %!PS-Adobe-3.0 > %%BoundingBox: 0 0 612 792 > %%Creator: GPL Ghostscript 904 (ps2write) > %%LanguageLevel: 2 > %%CreationDate: D:20120713171249+01'00' > %%Pages: 1 > %%EndComments We now use ps2write instead of pswrite because it produces better output (smaller, less bitmapped content etc). In the long term pswrite will be removed, but for now you can still use it if you really want to. > The %%BoundingBox comment in the new output is incorrect, > or at least deferred in a very unhelpful way; *this* > occurs later on... Well %%BoundingBox is a high water mark for *all* the pages, and since that value is probably the media size, its certainly legitimate, if perhaps inaccurate. I'm not certain there is anything we can do about this, as I think the header may be generated before we know all the page sizes. That said I'm willing to look at the problem if you raise a bug report at http://bugs.ghostscript.com Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2012-07-16 10:29 +0100
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2012-07-16 11:55 +0200
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-16 11:24 +0100
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-16 11:43 +0100
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2012-07-16 12:50 +0200
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-16 11:58 +0100
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-16 13:05 +0100
Re: style of PostScript generated by pdf2ps? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-16 11:15 +0100
csiph-web