Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #169
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Using ps2pdf - enhancements? |
| Date | 2011-04-27 07:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2821cd1bfb5278bc989839@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnirf0u0.8k4.nospam-abuse@chorin.math.berkeley.edu> |
In article <slrnirf0u0.8k4.nospam-abuse@chorin.math.berkeley.edu>, nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org says... > I'm puzzled why ps2pdf are so limited w.r.t. their options. Why > should people use clumsy gs command-lines directly when a trivial > change to ps2pdf would allow much more flexible syntax? Because people strangely expect ps2pdf to work the same on all systems. Your chanegs will only work on the shell script version of ps2pdf, they can't be made to work on the Windows batch file for example. But of course you are more than welcome to develop your own script. Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Using ps2pdf - enhancements? Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-04-27 02:47 +0000
Re: Using ps2pdf - enhancements? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2011-04-27 07:50 +0100
Re: Using ps2pdf - enhancements? Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-04-27 07:52 +0000
csiph-web