Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1106
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | (1 earlier) <tAwss.986215$it2.920768@fx22.am4> <87ip8tl2do.fsf@Compaq.site.inet> <rXGss.608752$A%.494054@fx26.am4> <87d2z0ksci.fsf@Compaq.site.inet> <6MQss.277223$g62.79799@fx06.am4> |
| Date | 2012-11-26 23:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <874nkcknw0.fsf@Compaq.site.inet> (permalink) |
Op maandag 26 nov 2012 22:00 CET schreef Chris: >>>> The generated files are posted at: >>>> http://decebal.nl/postscript/keepYourHead.png >>>> http://decebal.nl/postscript/keepYourHead2.png >>> >>> I don't see any "noise" in those. I do see that that the first one >>> looks like it is anti-aliased (hence the slight fuzziness around the >>> glyphs), whilst the second is not. If you want anti-aliased output >>> direct from Ghostscript, lookup the TextAlphaBits and GraphicsAlphaBits >>> command line options. >> >> I mean the anti-aliasing. And I really see it in both. I do not want >> anti-aliasing. I'll look into the commands you gave. The option >> +antialias with convert does not work very well. When converting from >> the pdf there is already some fuzziness. So I should find a way to >> prevent it cropping up in the pdf. > > I don't see any anti-aliasing effects in the second image > (keepYourHead2.png), however much I zoom in. Is it possible you're seeing > scaling artefacts from the image viewer you are using? Yep, sorry for the noise. :-( >>>> By the way, I even see noise in the pdf, but less and only under the >>>> text: >>>> http://decebal.nl/postscript/keepYourHead.pdf >>> >>> Again, I don't see any noise in that, using evince/poppler, xpdf, >>> Ghostscript and Acrobat. >> >> If you look under the letters, there is a little shadow. > > Nope, don't see it. What are you using to view the PDF? Adobe reader, but when I increased the zoom to 6400% there was nothing. So adobe put me on the wrong leg I am afraid. >> I do not see fuzziness at: >> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=445065655531047 > > That image is definitely anti-aliased. If you zoom in a bit, you can > clearly see the outline "softening" around the characters. I suspect the > effect is less obvious at normal zoom levels because the glyphs are > filled with a shading. So in future I should use shading. :-D Well, I have some experimenting to do. As if I do not have enough to do. :-P Thank you for your patience. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-25 22:43 +0100
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-25 23:54 +0100
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 09:50 +0000
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-26 21:43 +0100
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 21:00 +0000
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-26 23:19 +0100
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Chris <cjl@spamcop.net> - 2012-11-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-27 00:41 +0100
Re: Sometimes noise and resources about colours Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2012-11-26 22:15 +0100
csiph-web