Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #96
| From | luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: magic dictionary? |
| Date | 2011-03-30 14:44 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <2b56f695-e603-496b-9368-c117fc4e0023@f18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <aee67c8a-f090-4ffd-b78c-510a7f193daf@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <3073984e-9d82-4b10-bf67-ed697f5b4138@w7g2000pre.googlegroups.com> |
Scott Prouty wrote:
>
> I suppose this is something like the page device dictionary used for
> "setpagedevice". Of course the dictioanry passed to "setpagedevice"
> is merged with the device dictionary and then activated at the
> "setpagedevice" call. So, for example, duplexing can't be activated
> like this:
>
> currentpagedevice /Duplex true put
>
> But of course it can be like this:
>
> <</Duplex true>> setpagedevice
>
> It sounds like NeWS could do the former...
Yes. If currentpagedevice is a magic dictionary, the setpagedevice
could be simply:
/setpagedevice {
currentpagedevice begin
{def} forall
end
} def
But I'm probably getting way ahead of myself worrying about how to
do this. Garbage Collection, expandable dictionaries, deleting keys:
all of these probably need to happen first.
But it is the wild speculation that's the fun part.
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: magic dictionary? Scott Prouty <scott.prouty@solimarsystems.com> - 2011-03-29 12:07 -0700 Re: magic dictionary? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-03-30 14:44 -0700
csiph-web