Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.perl.misc > #4806

Re: Embedding code in qq{}?

From tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel)
Newsgroups comp.lang.perl.misc
Subject Re: Embedding code in qq{}?
Date 2012-03-19 07:00 +0000
Organization Tim McDaniel's at Panix
Message-ID <jk6lic$1h3$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <87limyk471.fsf@Gmail.com> <87pqc9trvt.fsf@stemsystems.com> <jk677e$9vk$1@reader1.panix.com> <87d389tej9.fsf@stemsystems.com>

Show all headers | View raw


I come to despise long chains of replies with several levels of
quoting all going over the same points, or people shifting goalposts
or going on into more false things.

I believe that I have adequately demonstrated, by quotations from man
pages and from test programs,
- $BLOCK, @BLOCK, and the rest take a BLOCK as defined by Perl,
  so long as the BLOCK finishes with a reference of the type demanded
  by the sigil
- they may be used as values in expressions whever a similar variable
  might be used
- someone else pointed out that only $BLOCK and @BLOCK may be
  interpolated into strings -- thank you for that.  (I'm sorry I've
  forgotten who, and I can't check while composing an article).  I
  assume the same is true for the right-hand side of s///
- I think it's not a particularly good idea except in certain simple
  cases -- removing the BLOCK and assigning a variable before would
  usually be clearer

I don't see much point in going on, unless someone posts something
new and false.

-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd@panix.com

Back to comp.lang.perl.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Embedding code in qq{}? XeCycle <XeCycle@Gmail.com> - 2012-03-18 10:56 +0800
  Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-17 23:04 -0400
    Re: Embedding code in qq{}? XeCycle <XeCycle@Gmail.com> - 2012-03-18 12:14 +0800
  Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-18 07:07 +0000
    Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2012-03-18 08:37 +0000
      Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-18 22:28 +0000
        Re: Embedding code in qq{}? merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) - 2012-03-18 16:18 -0700
          Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-19 02:21 +0000
            Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-19 00:14 -0400
              Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-19 06:42 +0000
                Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2012-03-19 16:40 +0000
        Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-18 19:29 -0400
    Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-18 15:24 -0400
      Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-18 22:33 +0000
        Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-18 19:24 -0400
          Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2012-03-19 00:49 +0000
            Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-18 22:05 -0400
          Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-19 02:55 +0000
            Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Uri Guttman <uri@stemsystems.com> - 2012-03-19 00:12 -0400
              Re: Embedding code in qq{}? tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2012-03-19 07:00 +0000
                Re: Embedding code in qq{}? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2012-03-19 16:43 +0000

csiph-web