Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.pascal.misc > #969

Re: Scalable locks....

Show all headers | View raw

The Sleep(0) is on Windows, to give up he time slice.



On 10/21/2014 6:10 PM, Ramine wrote:
> Hello...
>
>
> Please read the following paper to know why i have invented my
> scalable MLock:
>
>
> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/linux:lock.pdf
>
>
> But you have to be carefull, the Ticket spinlock with a proportional
> backoff is not good, cause if there is more context switch the thread
> that is scheduled has to use all its quantum time and this will slow
> a lot the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff , so you have
> to use a Sleep(0) just after the proportional backoff to solve this
> problem, but i have benchmarked it by adding the sleep(0) and i have
> noticed that my scalable MLock will give better performance than
> the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff and with a sleep(0)
> just after the proportional backoff, so i advice you to use my scalable
> MLock instead cause it's faster and better.
>
>
> You can download my scalable MLock from:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
>

Back to comp.lang.pascal.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Scalable locks.... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
  Re: Scalable locks.... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700

csiph-web