Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.pascal.misc > #923
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.pascal.misc |
| Subject | We are safe... |
| Date | 2014-06-14 17:22 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lnip08$e0l$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello... I think we are safe with my scalable RWLocks... Cause i have forgot one thing, if you are distributing the access to the memory using multiple memory buses, like is doing NUMA systems, so when in thios cofiguration of distributed memory each threads will access the memory in its correcponding memory bus to its corresponding memory, this transfers from the memory to the cores is much expensive than the cache-lines transfers from core to core of my writer side of my algorithm, hence this will make the parallel part of the Amdahl equation much bigger than the serial part, so my scalable RWLocks will scale very well, so i think my scalable RWLocks are still useful and good and scalable. So as you have noticed i am a little bit smart now, or am i smart ? A smile :) So be happy with my scalable RWLocks. You can download my scalable RWLocks from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-rwlock Thank you, Amine Moulay Moulay.
Back to comp.lang.pascal.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
We are safe... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-14 17:22 -0700
csiph-web