Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc
Subject	Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG
Date	Tue, 29 May 2012 07:34:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	Stack Usenet News Service
Lines	7
Message-ID	<slrnjs8v0a.2tcn.marcov@toad.stack.nl> (permalink)
References	<jprsdt$jlq$1@dont-email.me> <jpst27$3d2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnjs549e.ufc.marcov@turtle.stack.nl> <jpunv4$490$1@dont-email.me> <jpv7gc$s9l$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jq1jes$k8i$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host	toad.stack.nl
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	mud.stack.nl 1338276874 62284 2001:610:1108:5010::135 (29 May 2012 07:34:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@stack.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 29 May 2012 07:34:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD)
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc:302

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2012-05-29, P E Schoen <paul@peschoen.com> wrote:
> "S.G"  wrote in message news:jpv7gc$s9l$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> The other library I found specifies D5 and above in the readme file, but the 
> packages include packages for D3 and D4:
>     package CPortLib4;

Afaik that /is/ the TComport component.

Back to comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-26 20:27 -0400
  Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-26 21:08 -0400
  Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-27 12:44 +0300
    Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Marco van de Voort <marcov@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-05-27 20:40 +0000
      Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-27 22:29 -0400
        Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-28 08:55 +0200
          Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-28 11:08 -0400
          Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 00:31 -0400
            Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-29 07:34 +0000
            Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-29 11:09 +0200
              Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 06:20 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 08:35 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-29 11:43 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-30 03:10 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-30 11:01 -0400
    Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2016-08-18 19:50 -0400

csiph-web