Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.modula3 > #27
| From | bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.modula3 |
| Subject | Re: Status of Modula-3 |
| Date | 2014-04-28 16:01 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ljlu0c$g2g$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ljllcu$148$1@dont-email.me> <87ioptwjqv.fsf@ixod.org> |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:34:32 +0100, Mark Carroll wrote: > I was going to suggest that it's been pretty much dead for years, which > would be a pity because Modula-3 is actually a rather nice language, > practical and well-designed and not filled with gotchas Couldn't agree more. So it the case that the vast majority of Wirthian languages are under palliative care? I understand that the Delphi derivative of Pascal is still out in the streets. -- Bruce
Back to comp.lang.modula3 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Status of Modula-3 bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> - 2014-04-28 13:34 +0000
Re: Status of Modula-3 Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2014-04-28 16:34 +0100
Re: Status of Modula-3 bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> - 2014-04-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Status of Modula-3 "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2014-04-29 00:16 +0200
Re: Status of Modula-3 Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2014-11-09 10:21 +0000
csiph-web