Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.modula3 > #28

Re: Status of Modula-3

Show all headers | View raw

bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> writes:

> I had a long and fruitful relationship with Modula-2. I haven't touched 
> it now for years. Modula-3 should be fairly easy to pick up, but is it 
> worth it? Is M3 "viable" in the sense that is there a living community of 
> users/developers?

Given the various OpenSSL bugs, it could be a good idea to start
replacement free software projects in Modula-3 (or other good languages
such as Common Lisp, Ada, Eiffel, Haskell).

If you could provide a libm3ssl.so to replace libopenssl.so, without all
the bugs, I guess it would do more to promote Modula-3 than anything
else.


-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__
http://www.informatimago.com/
"Le mercure monte ?  C'est le moment d'acheter !"

Back to comp.lang.modula3 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Status of Modula-3 bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> - 2014-04-28 13:34 +0000
  Re: Status of Modula-3 Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2014-04-28 16:34 +0100
    Re: Status of Modula-3 bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> - 2014-04-28 16:01 +0000
  Re: Status of Modula-3 "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2014-04-29 00:16 +0200
  Re: Status of Modula-3 Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2014-11-09 10:21 +0000

csiph-web