Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.misc > #1501
| From | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.misc, comp.lang.perl.misc |
| Subject | Re: should we Go now? |
| Date | 2013-02-25 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87wqtwmhbp.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink) |
| References | <87hal29eeb.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87ehg5u0r3.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <874nh1abn5.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87y5edcxjv.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <ap0hrgFqjdgU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> writes: > In comp.lang.misc Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> wrote: >> [...] not based on the inherently wrong assumption >> that future use of an object will be impossible if no pointer to it >> can be found within the address space of a single process at an >> essentially arbitrary time. [...] > > Can you elaborate on this? > > F'up-To limited to c.l.m. Don't try to play this kind of tricks on me. I have no interest in this discussion beyond that it involved features perl 5 has and Go hasn't which happen to be among the more prominent reasons why I'm using perl 5 for certain tasks and won't be using Go. The answer to your 'mock question' you've attached to the the random fabrication you've created by picking a coupld of half sentences out of a text I wrote was contained in the parts of the text you've chosen to delete and in some other postings as well. Go read them if you're curious.
Back to comp.lang.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
should we Go now? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 10:47 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-02-24 13:40 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-24 16:37 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 17:02 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-24 19:38 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2013-02-25 07:23 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-25 17:30 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-02-24 21:42 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-24 22:26 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-25 01:04 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 13:32 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-02-25 15:28 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-25 17:54 +0000
Re: should we Go now? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-02-25 01:29 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 13:12 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 17:04 +0000
Re: should we Go now? Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de> - 2013-02-24 18:24 +0100
Re: should we Go now? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-02-25 17:01 -0800
csiph-web