Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.lisp > #60777 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Madhu <enometh@meer.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-04-25 20:35 +0530 |
| Last post | 2026-06-08 04:06 +0530 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.lisp
slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-04-25 20:35 +0530
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-25 18:27 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-05-07 05:22 +0530
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2026-05-07 15:14 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-05-08 09:48 +0530
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-06-02 21:50 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-06-03 09:21 +0530
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-06-03 22:48 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-04 03:22 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-06-04 17:01 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-04 22:42 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-06-08 04:13 +0530
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:22 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-08 07:52 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:42 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:24 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:57 +0100
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2026-06-08 09:25 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:31 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-06-07 12:31 -0700
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-08 02:27 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-08 07:36 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-09 00:30 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 00:25 -0400
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-09 05:49 +0000
Re: slot-value-using-class to remap "virtual" slots & closer-mop Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2026-06-08 04:06 +0530
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-08 02:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11059b8$2u485$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60809 |
On Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:31:27 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: > I've used [setq] because I was used to it from Emacs Lisp .. Emacs lisp supports setf. Yes, I have the habit of using setq, too ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-08 07:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1105rek$329uh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60815 |
Lawrence D´Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > > Emacs lisp supports setf. It does now, it didn't. I'd certainly use setq if I had to write elisp again. -- www.tfeb.org/computer/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-09 00:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1107mr0$3k6ea$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60816 |
On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:36:52 -0000 (UTC), tfb wrote: > Lawrence D´Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> >> Emacs lisp supports setf. > > It does now, it didn't. I'd certainly use setq if I had to write > elisp again. When did you last do so?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-09 00:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87ldcoxrup.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #60824 |
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:36:52 -0000 (UTC), tfb wrote: > < > Lawrence D´Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: < >> < >> Emacs lisp supports setf. < > < > It does now, it didn't. I'd certainly use setq if I had to write < > elisp again. > > When did you last do so? I just read a book on AI algos...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tfb <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-09 05:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11089h6$3oj2a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60824 |
Lawrence D´Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > > When did you last do so? > last commit to my elisp repo was early 2025, the previous one was early 2024. Pretty much these are adjustments for new versions of emacs or macos lossage. The last time I wrote anything seriously was likely two decades ago now. -- www.tfeb.org/computer/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Madhu <enometh@meer.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-08 04:06 +0530 |
| Message-ID | <m3tsre0yhy.fsf@pison.robolove.meer.net> |
| In reply to | #60807 |
* tfb <11046ce$2ktnj$1@dont-email.me> : Wrote on Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:31:10 -0000 (UTC): >> it's the greatest thing because you can use SETQ >> instead of SETF. > Uh, is this some joke I am missing? Do people really still use SETQ? Do > they think it is somehow an advantage? If so, how? freedom of choice. s w e e t f r e e e d o m coming from english perhaps you can appreciate nuances of usage: the distinction between "a" and "an" before words, and the and how it sounds when non-natives[2] elide[1] the distinction 1 original sense of elide, 2 non-native speakers of course (I am one)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.lisp
csiph-web