Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.lisp > #16618
| From | "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp |
| Subject | Re: Lisp and Perl |
| Date | 2011-02-09 15:13 +0100 |
| Organization | Informatimago |
| Message-ID | <87ipwt1ejy.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <8739nz2y0s.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <7x62sv6yxz.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <87zkq7osq3.fsf@ma-patru.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de> <7xbp2m9rq3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <874o8dpq49.fsf@ma-patru.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de> |
Nicolas Neuss <lastname@kit.edu> writes:
> Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Neuss <lastname@kit.edu> writes:
>>> Did you read the original link (which Pascal gave as well)?
>>> http://the-programmers-stone.com/the-original-talks/day-1-thinking-about-thinking/
>>> I think it is much better than the summary.
>>
>> I did see that, and saw the same bogusness. I especially chuckled
>> about how OOP was such a mapper thing.
>
> I read that differently:
>
> "Object Orientation (OO) and mapping have an interesting
> relationship. OO is often seen in very different ways by mappers and
> packers. The mapper’s map is a kind of object model that has a rich
> variety of objects and associations. Mappers see OO as an elegant way
> to design software once they have understood the problem. Packers
> seem to see OO as a way of wandering around the problem domain and
> creating software objects, then just wiring them up as they are
> found. [...]"
>
> So, OO is seen as useful for both "mappers" and "packers".
Yes. The difference is that packers will have wide class hierarchies,
while mappers will have deep class hierarchies.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Back to comp.lang.lisp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-07 20:57 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd@aol.com> - 2011-02-07 22:02 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@pas.despam.s.il.vous.plait.mac.com> - 2011-02-08 17:58 -0500
Re: Lisp and Perl Krzysztof Bieniasz <krzysztof.t.bieniasz@gmail.com> - 2011-02-09 00:41 +0000
Re: Lisp and Perl TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd@aol.com> - 2011-02-07 23:42 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 00:12 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-08 08:24 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Peter Keller <psilord@cs.wisc.edu> - 2011-02-08 18:06 +0000
Re: Lisp and Perl Peter Keller <psilord@cs.wisc.edu> - 2011-02-09 16:45 +0000
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-08 21:42 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Peter Keller <psilord@cs.wisc.edu> - 2011-02-08 20:54 +0000
Re: Lisp and Perl Nicolas Neuss <lastname@kit.edu> - 2011-02-09 10:02 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@pas.despam.s.il.vous.plait.mac.com> - 2011-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-08 01:03 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-02-07 18:29 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl Nicolas Neuss <lastname@kit.edu> - 2011-02-09 09:29 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-09 15:13 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-02-08 03:39 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Nicolas Neuss <lastname@kit.edu> - 2011-02-08 09:06 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Edmunds Cers <edmunds@laivas.lv> - 2011-02-09 10:36 +0100
Re: Lisp and Perl Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-02-08 12:49 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 00:01 -0800
Re: Lisp and Perl Don Geddis <don@geddis.org> - 2011-02-07 14:54 -0800
csiph-web