Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8089

Re: Code not working

From "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Code not working
Date 2011-11-06 22:59 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <j96sg0$h28$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <r14go8-eub.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <j93tcs$jcg$1@dont-email.me> <1996701.i4alEN71Z9@PointedEars.de> <j948qn$vn6$1@dont-email.me> <2313595.P6UQk0Ptvu@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


11/6/2011 10:11 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn trolled:

>> No markup validator reports <script type="text/javscript">  as an error
>
> AISB, you will have to prove your assertions if you want to be taken
> seriously.

You made a claim, you prove it. Of course you cannot, hence you babble 
in your trolling style.

>> (because it is not a reportable markup error).
>
> You are wrong.

You could prove me wrong if you cited a specification or mentioned a 
single validator, or even a linter called a "validator", if that were 
possible. But it isn't, so you keep trolling with irrelevant remarks and 
"theories."

> So in fact there are various ways, including those mentioned, that allow
> such errors in attribute values to be flagged upon markup validation.

Are you saying that you could, in theory, create some software you call 
as validator and that would give the report you referred to? But you 
just couldn't "bother". I'm not surprised.

So instead of throwing some list of irrelevant URLs at us, can you 
specify any "validator" that gives the report you referred to, even 
under a most liberal interpretation of "validator"?

Consider your trolling to have been exposed.

-- 
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Code not working Mclaren Fan <himanshu1495@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 08:41 -0700
  Re: Code not working williamc <temp4@williamc.com> - 2011-11-05 12:10 -0400
  Re: Code not working Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-05 17:19 +0100
  Re: Code not working Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2011-11-05 17:15 +0100
    Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-05 19:56 +0200
      Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-05 21:34 +0100
        Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-05 23:11 +0200
          Re: Code not working Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-06 01:06 +0100
          Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-06 21:11 +0100
            Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-06 22:59 +0200
              Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 00:12 +0100
        Re: Code not working Dr J R Stockton <reply1144@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-06 19:53 +0000
          Re: Code not working Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2011-11-07 02:54 +0000
  Re: Code not working Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 23:58 +0000
    Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-08 21:43 +0100
  Re: Code not working Dr J R Stockton <reply1144@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-06 19:39 +0000

csiph-web