Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8089
| From | "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Code not working |
| Date | 2011-11-06 22:59 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j96sg0$h28$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <r14go8-eub.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <j93tcs$jcg$1@dont-email.me> <1996701.i4alEN71Z9@PointedEars.de> <j948qn$vn6$1@dont-email.me> <2313595.P6UQk0Ptvu@PointedEars.de> |
11/6/2011 10:11 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn trolled: >> No markup validator reports <script type="text/javscript"> as an error > > AISB, you will have to prove your assertions if you want to be taken > seriously. You made a claim, you prove it. Of course you cannot, hence you babble in your trolling style. >> (because it is not a reportable markup error). > > You are wrong. You could prove me wrong if you cited a specification or mentioned a single validator, or even a linter called a "validator", if that were possible. But it isn't, so you keep trolling with irrelevant remarks and "theories." > So in fact there are various ways, including those mentioned, that allow > such errors in attribute values to be flagged upon markup validation. Are you saying that you could, in theory, create some software you call as validator and that would give the report you referred to? But you just couldn't "bother". I'm not surprised. So instead of throwing some list of irrelevant URLs at us, can you specify any "validator" that gives the report you referred to, even under a most liberal interpretation of "validator"? Consider your trolling to have been exposed. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Code not working Mclaren Fan <himanshu1495@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 08:41 -0700
Re: Code not working williamc <temp4@williamc.com> - 2011-11-05 12:10 -0400
Re: Code not working Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-05 17:19 +0100
Re: Code not working Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> - 2011-11-05 17:15 +0100
Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-05 19:56 +0200
Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-05 21:34 +0100
Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-05 23:11 +0200
Re: Code not working Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-06 01:06 +0100
Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-06 21:11 +0100
Re: Code not working "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-06 22:59 +0200
Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 00:12 +0100
Re: Code not working Dr J R Stockton <reply1144@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-06 19:53 +0000
Re: Code not working Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2011-11-07 02:54 +0000
Re: Code not working Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 23:58 +0000
Re: Code not working Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-08 21:43 +0100
Re: Code not working Dr J R Stockton <reply1144@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-06 19:39 +0000
csiph-web