Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8549
| From | Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? |
| Newsgroups | alt.html, comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <gqamc7phm92nv5ln9je0cpbgr8f2tddr8l@4ax.com> <4ecba2ce$0$28722$a8266bb1@newsreader.readnews.com> <f69oc7ptj05ej573g48eflaogqmu06as43@4ax.com> |
| Date | 2011-11-23 01:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4ecc4b7f$0$28629$a8266bb1@newsreader.readnews.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:41:06 -0800, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On 22 Nov 2011 13:25:34 GMT, Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:09:07 -0800, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >>> Note the blank line between the "Windows Properties" and "Frames" >>> lines. Note that there is no blank line between the "Browser >>> Properties" and values lines. Why not? >> >>What does this look like: >> >>http://www.sined.co.uk/tmp/wirchenko.htm >> >>Note that I've wrapped all the text in enclosing block elements i.e. >><p></ p>. It's a personal preference of mine that text be encapsulated >>in such block elements, and that they be closed, even if it's not >>strictly necessary according to the standards. Partly because the first >>book / tutorial on html that I read back in the mid 90's said it should >>be done thus, and whether it was right or wrong at the time, and >>regardless of the fact that it may not matter with some versions, that's >>still the way I do it. > > Yes, it works. I already found that out. I am wondering if <p> > tags are compulsory to be sure of correctness. I am trying to avoid > cargo-cult programming. It may be browser dependant, and depend on how each browser handles un- encapsulated as opposed to encapsulated text wrt stylistic presentation - and that might further come down to user preferences. It's old, but the following explanatory text from the HTML 3.2 specification at <url:http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32-19970114#body> might shed light: "Most elements that can appear in the document body fall into one of two groups: block level elements which cause paragraph breaks, and text level elements which don't." This distinction was carried over into section 7.5.3 of the 4.01 Specification, albeit worded slightly differently: "By default, block-level elements are formatted differently than inline elements. Generally, block-level elements begin on new lines, inline elements do not." Of course, how exactly a browser interprets "begin on a new line" for some inline text after a preceding block element (eg a header) is a matter for the browser - some might insert a margin relating to the previous block element, some might consider that the preceding block element implies a new-line after regardless of what follows, others might not etc. Rgds Denis McMahon
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
<h2> Odd Behaviour? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-21 21:09 -0800
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-22 08:42 +0200
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-22 14:37 -0800
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmacdotcom@example.com> - 2011-11-22 18:06 -0500
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-23 01:12 +0200
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-22 17:19 -0800
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Doug Miller <doug_at_milmacdotcom@example.com> - 2011-11-22 20:26 -0500
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-22 13:25 +0000
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-22 14:41 -0800
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 01:25 +0000
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Swifty <steve.j.swift@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 05:33 +0000
Re: <h2> Odd Behaviour? Dr J R Stockton <reply1147@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-23 19:51 +0000
csiph-web