Re: Dead link in FAQ Notes

From	Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Dead link in FAQ Notes
Date	2011-11-23 17:51 -0800
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<4befd8d8-d099-4944-bc8b-2e81f33e8dd1@cc2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	<b41de590-c660-425c-a85c-0a559608200d@n14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <LGCNYWG9FVzOFwr4@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message <b41de590-c660-425c-a85c-0a559608200d@n1
> 4g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:28:19, Scott Sauyet
> <scott.sau...@gmail.com> posted:
>
>>    http://kangax.github.com/nfe/
>
> Needs updating; ECMA 5 is no longer upcoming.

Regardless, a dead link is worse than a link to a page with some minor
edits needed.

> It would be better to cite only pages that enable the reader, without
> undue difficulty, to mail the owner of the pages in order to point out
> where changes seem appropriate,

At the bottom of that article are links to a comment-enabled blog
post, kangax's email, and the github repository for the article
itself.  It seems pretty easy to get in touch with him.

  -- Scott

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Dead link in FAQ Notes Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-11-22 13:28 -0800
  Re: Dead link in FAQ Notes Dr J R Stockton <reply1147@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-23 20:03 +0000
    Re: Dead link in FAQ Notes Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 17:51 -0800

csiph-web