Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #7797
| Message-ID | <4702008.Z4qSRW7Nsu@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2011-10-28 19:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Regular expression question |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (2 earlier) <2997930.SPkdTlGXAF@PointedEars.de> <d20558c5-26d2-4464-9068-db92e87fec9e@a17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <c21d1200-abd0-430b-a97e-77c5bcecab47@i15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <1674123.KyhKTayAOI@PointedEars.de> <vcr93vsq.fsf@gmail.com> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes: >> Antony Scriven wrote: >>> is also the reason why Lasse's solution (using >>> String.prototype.lastIndexOf) is preferable IMHO. --Antony >> http://foo.example/bar > > My "solution" was very hardcoded to the format that the OP used, i.e., > ending in "/somename.html". > Since that was all the examples he gave, and no real textual explanation, It was clear enough to me that they wanted to know the last path component of a URI. > it's impossible to generalize further. Well, it wasn't. > Maybe I should have said that :) It was clear to me that your code was limited, however I saw and still see no good reason for doing that when the general solution – the one using RegExp, which was being asked for – is so obvious. PointedEars -- Danny Goodman's books are out of date and teach practices that are positively harmful for cross-browser scripting. -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <cife6q$253$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> (2004)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Regular expression question cerr <ron.eggler@gmail.com> - 2011-10-25 21:43 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Mike Duffy <never@you.mind.com> - 2011-10-26 12:11 +0000
Re: Regular expression question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 16:54 +0000
Re: Regular expression question Lasse Reichstein Nielsen <lrn.unread@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 19:33 +0200
Re: Regular expression question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-26 23:40 +0200
Re: Regular expression question Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-27 17:30 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-27 17:39 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-28 03:50 +0200
Re: Regular expression question Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-28 08:46 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Lasse Reichstein Nielsen <lrn.unread@gmail.com> - 2011-10-28 18:50 +0200
Re: Regular expression question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-28 19:50 +0200
Re: Regular expression question Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-28 11:41 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-28 12:54 -0700
Re: Regular expression question Dr J R Stockton <reply1143@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-27 19:41 +0100
Re: Regular expression question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-28 04:12 +0200
csiph-web