Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news-peer.in.tum.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID	<1951615.nKmheAe9J7@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Date	Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:53:37 +0100
User-Agent	KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
Subject	Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ?
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
References	<9j9pfhFe3lU1@mid.individual.net> <jaommj$c2$1@dont-email.me> <2194421.p0D5BbiEc1@PointedEars.de> <japa23$krr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jaq3jm$h66$1@dont-email.me>
Followup-To	comp.lang.javascript
MIME-Version	1.0
Lines	23
NNTP-Posting-Date	26 Nov 2011 12:53:38 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host	a3c2bf5f.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace	DXC=dGPQKV_9TPY\PS5Xo=M[RVMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[Q^kYTE\6d>QDZm8W4\YJN\;?f@h5gMfb\Q>]g3QkX_`T4V3C1eaeRdQ
X-Complaints-To	usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:8652

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show key headers only | View raw

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

> 2011-11-26 1:57, J.R. wrote:
>> "Either cancelBubble property or stopPropagation() method" means only
>> one check is necessary, not both, as there is not a 3rd option.
> 
> And, in reality, as the page I mentioned says, you can assign to
> e.cancelBubble without a check, as adding a property to an object causes
> no real harm.
> 
> There are of course people who just have to complain about any code that
> solves a problem, […]

Your arrogance is the cause of your ignorance, which blinds you for the 
possibilities that await you.


PointedEars
-- 
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee

Thread

<ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Jörg Weule <weule@7b5.de> - 2011-11-25 16:10 +0100
  Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2011-11-25 17:30 +0100
  Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-25 17:58 +0100
    Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Jörg Weule <weule@7b5.de> - 2011-11-25 18:42 +0100
      Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2011-11-25 19:11 +0100
        Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Jörg Weule <weule@7b5.de> - 2011-11-25 19:37 +0100
        Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-25 20:04 +0100
  Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-25 20:27 +0200
    Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-25 20:28 +0100
      Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2011-11-25 21:57 -0200
        Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-26 09:14 +0200
          Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-26 12:53 +0100
        Re: <ul><li><ul><li>... onclick() only for one node ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-26 12:51 +0100

csiph-web