Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.security > #19

Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.security
Subject Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates
Date Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:09:16 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Message-ID <iosua7$g28$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <f3317f71-49c9-448d-9baa-8cb439a19b4b@l36g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <ed8d8950-6fb4-4082-800f-1609258ceb96@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <osl3r696edh6fp07t1d5219j5fb1jnpd1g@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2F9wFk8uhjDHDbuneVzw7g"; logging-data="16456"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FJJOKPMcpmP602WGeT9Ti"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.2pre) Gecko/20110422 SeaMonkey/2.1pre
In-Reply-To <osl3r696edh6fp07t1d5219j5fb1jnpd1g@4ax.com>
X-Face )>>ChyF_H<b)u~Zjgo/=wa~;=qyW%.F\L.d^fKL[;y\=tY\]M}2t(a^;PKS}9g|k@\vkA<P Q|4?kcJ52334f:CaCrQZ=]D~txPPh6[y{xHkZ+4/KPKZ~|*K#?EqeP0W]iU*Ldy-hyjh0)N4c.I<m) K}GsUUe0)~24Xp`Jt
Cancel-Lock sha1:Yn+5Y6Vob3Ctkv7VICuv325ZwNE=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.security:19

Show key headers only | View raw


Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:38:20 -0700, /Roedy Green/:

> I wish RFCs would in the header report the obsoletes/obsoleted-by
> information.  It is so easy to use out of date information.

RFCs do state obsoletes information in their headers.  For the 
obsoleted-by information, just use:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/

e.g.:

<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2253>:

Obsoleted by: 4510, 4514     PROPOSED STANDARD
Updated by: 3377                  Errata Exist

-- 
Stanimir

Back to comp.lang.java.security | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Yosi Izaq <izaqyos@gmail.com> - 2011-04-21 06:22 -0700
  Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Yosi Izaq <izaqyos@gmail.com> - 2011-04-21 08:27 -0700
    Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-22 17:35 +0200
      Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Yosi Izaq <izaqyos@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 02:21 -0700
    Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-22 12:38 -0700
      Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-04-23 01:09 +0300
        Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-24 11:54 -0700
          Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-24 21:32 +0200
            Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:23 -0700
      Re: X500Principal and UTF-16 encoded certificates Yosi Izaq <izaqyos@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 02:32 -0700

csiph-web