Protecting packages

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!86597e80!not-for-mail
From	"towardajavastandard" <towardajavastandard@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this>
Subject	Protecting packages
Message-ID	<1193401885.908882.51290@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
X-Comment-To	comp.lang.java.security
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.security
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Gateway	time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92]
Lines	18
Date	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:07:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host	96.60.20.240
X-Complaints-To	news@tds.net
X-Trace	newsreading01.news.tds.net 1303920468 96.60.20.240 (Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:07:48 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:07:48 CDT
Organization	TDS.net
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.security:39

Show key headers only | View raw

  To: comp.lang.java.security
To people writing production software:

Do you actually prevent package access by adding certain packages to
the package.access property of the java.security file, as described
here:

http://java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2001/tt0130.html

Or do you prefer sealing jar files?

-----
Your response will help in developing a java secure coding standard.

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.security | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Protecting packages "towardajavastandard" <towardajavastandard@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 16:07 +0000

csiph-web