Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38728 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-24 18:13 +0100 |
| Last post | 2019-04-13 22:45 -0400 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Release Frequency Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2019-02-24 18:13 +0100
Re: Release Frequency Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-02-24 19:16 +0100
Re: Release Frequency bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-02-24 18:15 -0800
Re: Release Frequency Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-04-08 12:37 +0100
Re: Release Frequency Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-04-13 22:45 -0400
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-24 18:13 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Release Frequency |
| Message-ID | <gdg1lqF8njgU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 24.02.19 16:05, Stefan Ram wrote: > Someone writes a book on Java SE 12 - It's outdate on its > release date already (or at least readers might think so > when they read that Java SE 13 is out). Are books still a thing? I thought this was so 20th century... ;-) robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-24 19:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q4un2b$369$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #38728 |
On 2019-02-24 18:13, Robert Klemme wrote: > On 24.02.19 16:05, Stefan Ram wrote: > >> Someone writes a book on Java SE 12 - It's outdate on its >> release date already (or at least readers might think so >> when they read that Java SE 13 is out). > > Are books still a thing? I thought this was so 20th century... Right. He meant: a podcast that you can listen to while eating while exercising while repainting your home.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bursejan@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-24 18:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c8d87b74-d164-48e3-979e-151d8f5370e8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #38729 |
I guess the release frequence is in revers proportion to the speed of the new JDKs. I get for the same byte code on the same mac machine: JDK 1.8.0 202 : 9'126 ms GraalVM 1.0.0 rc12 : 9'667 ms JDK 13 : 13'646 ms And the winner is, good ole JDK 1.8. Interestingly on a newer windows machine, the winner is GraalVM. Unix, I didn't test. On Sunday, February 24, 2019 at 7:16:51 PM UTC+1, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > On 2019-02-24 18:13, Robert Klemme wrote: > > On 24.02.19 16:05, Stefan Ram wrote: > > > >> Someone writes a book on Java SE 12 - It's outdate on its > >> release date already (or at least readers might think so > >> when they read that Java SE 13 is out). > > > > Are books still a thing? I thought this was so 20th century... > > Right. He meant: a podcast that you can listen to while eating while > exercising while repainting your home.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-08 12:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q8fbqd$3l4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #38730 |
On 25/02/2019 02:15, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: > JDK 1.8.0 202 : 9'126 ms > > GraalVM 1.0.0 rc12 : 9'667 ms > > JDK 13 : 13'646 ms > > And the winner is, good ole JDK 1.8. Umm.... That's interesting. I thought the whole idea of JRE "modules" was to improve efficiency and remove bloat.... Guess not! Regards, Graeme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-13 22:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <q8u6so$gt9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #38881 |
On 4/8/2019 7:37 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 25/02/2019 02:15, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:
>> JDK 1.8.0 202 : 9'126 ms
>>
>> GraalVM 1.0.0 rc12 : 9'667 ms
>>
>> JDK 13 : 13'646 ms
>>
>> And the winner is, good ole JDK 1.8.
>
> Umm.... That's interesting. I thought the whole idea of JRE "modules"
> was to improve efficiency and remove bloat.... Guess not!
Not accurate.
https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/reqs/
<quote>
As outlined in the JSR, the specific goals are to provide and enable:
Reliable configuration, to replace the brittle, error-prone
class-path mechanism with a means for program components to declare
explicit dependences upon one another;
Strong encapsulation, to allow a component to declare which of its
APIs are accessible by other components, and which are not;
A scalable Java SE Platform, whose components can be assembled by
developers into custom configurations that contain only the
functionality actually required by an application;
Greater platform integrity, to ensure that code that is internal to
a platform implementation is not accessible from outside the
implementation; and
Improved performance, by applying whole-program optimization
techniques to complete configurations of platform, library, and
application components.
</quote>
Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web