Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23869 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-05-06 21:16 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-05-07 21:34 -0400 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: lectures about "programming methodology" Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-06 21:16 -0400
Re: lectures about "programming methodology" Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-07 08:50 +0300
Re: lectures about "programming methodology" Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-07 08:52 +0300
Re: lectures about "programming methodology" Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-07 21:34 -0400
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-06 21:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: lectures about "programming methodology" |
| Message-ID | <518855e1$0$32115$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On 5/6/2013 8:23 AM, Stefan Ram wrote: > ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes: >> But I have watched only the first lectures so far. > > I just watched another lecture and noticed the following: > > He said something to the effect that the type »int« was there > to store an int value. I would say that an int /variable/ is > there to store a value, while the /type/ int can also be the > type of an expression (like »2«) that is not necessarily > stored anywhere at run-time. > > He said that a variable had a name. This is not always true > in Java (he referred to Java, since he is exclusively using > Java). In Java there also are anonymous variables, like the > variables of an array. > > He said that the remainder operator »%« can only be applied > to integers. This also is not true in Java IIRC. > > I am actually watching this to learn English pronunciation > of programming terms (otherwise, I just would read a text), > and what I /did/ like was that for the word »char« he gave > the pronunciations of /kA&/ and /kæ&/ (where A is the open > back unrounded vowel and & is the schwar), which I also use > (/kA&/). Bjarne Stroustrup says it was /tSA&/ (where tS is > the voiceless palato-alveolar affricate), well, maybe that > is valid for C++ programmers ... And? None of these items seems particular relevant for teachings students programming. Not at a high school in the middle of nowhere. And not at Harvard. Arne
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-07 08:50 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kma4g4$lag$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23869 |
Mon, 06 May 2013 21:16:16 -0400, /Arne Vajhøj/: > None of these items seems particular relevant for teachings > students programming. > > Not at a high school in the middle of nowhere. And not at Harvard. Why was Harvard brought in? Stefan originally mentioned Standford: > I decided to watch lecture videos from the Stanford > University... -- Stanimir
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-07 08:52 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <kma4jp$lag$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #23881 |
Tue, 07 May 2013 08:50:18 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: > Mon, 06 May 2013 21:16:16 -0400, /Arne Vajhøj/: > >> None of these items seems particular relevant for teachings >> students programming. >> >> Not at a high school in the middle of nowhere. And not at Harvard. > > Why was Harvard brought in? Stefan originally mentioned Standford: > >> I decided to watch lecture videos from the Stanford >> University... Just saw in another reply it was a mistake. -- Stanimir
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-07 21:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5189abc4$0$32105$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| In reply to | #23882 |
On 5/7/2013 1:52 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Tue, 07 May 2013 08:50:18 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: >> Mon, 06 May 2013 21:16:16 -0400, /Arne Vajhøj/: >> >>> None of these items seems particular relevant for teachings >>> students programming. >>> >>> Not at a high school in the middle of nowhere. And not at Harvard. >> >> Why was Harvard brought in? Stefan originally mentioned Standford: >> >>> I decided to watch lecture videos from the Stanford >>> University... > > Just saw in another reply it was a mistake. Yep. For some reason I thought it was Harvard. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web