Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10681 > unrolled thread

two new JDKs

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  two new JDKs Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 13:10 -0800
    Re: two new JDKs Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-12-12 22:12 +0100
      Re: two new JDKs Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-12 13:48 -0800
        Re: two new JDKs Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-12 15:22 -0800
    Re: two new JDKs Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-12-13 00:33 +0100
      Re: two new JDKs Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-12 19:39 -0500
      Re: two new JDKs Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-12-12 22:17 -0800
      Re: two new JDKs markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-13 07:23 -0800
    Re: two new JDKs Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-13 00:54 -0800

#10681 — two new JDKs

Java JDK 1.6,         1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7,         1.7.0_02,  

are now out.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
For me, the appeal of computer programming is that
even though I am quite a klutz,
I can still produce something, in a sense
perfect, because the computer gives me as many
chances as I please to get it right.
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#10682

Roedy Green schrieb:
> Java JDK 1.6,         1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7,         1.7.0_02,
>
> are now out.
thanks for sharing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10683

On 12/12/11 1:12 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Roedy Green schrieb:
>> Java JDK 1.6, 1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7, 1.7.0_02,
>>
>> are now out.
> thanks for sharing
I agreed. Thanks for sharing!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10684

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:48:24 -0800, Daniel Pitts
<newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly
quoted someone who said :

>On 12/12/11 1:12 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
>> Roedy Green schrieb:
>>> Java JDK 1.6, 1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7, 1.7.0_02,
>>>
>>> are now out.
>> thanks for sharing
>I agreed. Thanks for sharing!

You might wonder why it is always me who posts new JDK versions.  I
use a utility called Vercheck that checks for new versions of about 80
apps every day.  The results are posted at
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/utilities.html
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
For me, the appeal of computer programming is that
even though I am quite a klutz,
I can still produce something, in a sense
perfect, because the computer gives me as many
chances as I please to get it right.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10685

Roedy Green schrieb:
> Java JDK 1.6,         1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7,         1.7.0_02,
>
> are now out.

Nice feature of JDK 1.7:

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.html

Reminds me of Intel Thread Building Blocks for C++. Any comparison around?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10686

On 12/12/2011 6:33 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Roedy Green schrieb:
>> Java JDK 1.6, 1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7, 1.7.0_02,
>>
>> are now out.
>
> Nice feature of JDK 1.7:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.html
>
> Reminds me of Intel Thread Building Blocks for C++. Any comparison around?

It is more like .NET TPL.

But For Join will first achieve its full potential when lambdas
are added in Java 8.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10690

On 12/12/2011 3:33 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Roedy Green schrieb:
>> Java JDK 1.6, 1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7, 1.7.0_02,
>>
>> are now out.
>
> Nice feature of JDK 1.7:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.html
>
>
> Reminds me of Intel Thread Building Blocks for C++. Any comparison around?


https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/msg/1adc937ea3074458?hl=en

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10702

On 12/12/2011 3:33 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Roedy Green schrieb:
>> Java JDK 1.6, 1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7, 1.7.0_02,
>>
>> are now out.
>
> Nice feature of JDK 1.7:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.html
>
>
> Reminds me of Intel Thread Building Blocks for C++. Any comparison around?


Fork-Join is a well known multithreading pattern.  I'm not sure what a 
Thread Building Block is.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork-join_queue>

That Wikipedia article refers a bit more to the mathematical parts of 
Fork-Join, but the list of references at the end of the article are 
useful for additional concrete information.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10694

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:10:30 -0800, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>Java JDK 1.6,         1.6.0_30, Java JDK 1.7,         1.7.0_02,  
>
>are now out.

See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jdk.html and
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jre.html
for notes on downloading and installing.  It is pretty
straightforward. The notes are mainly for newbies.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
For me, the appeal of computer programming is that
even though I am quite a klutz,
I can still produce something, in a sense
perfect, because the computer gives me as many
chances as I please to get it right.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web