Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16959 > unrolled thread

Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks." Capa Espírito <_@.example> - 2012-08-02 04:52 -0600
    Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks." Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-08-02 10:02 +0000
      NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-03 01:36 +0000
        NOMINATION - Account Banned for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.invalid> - 2012-08-02 22:29 -0400
          Re: NOMINATION - Account Banned for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> [Tor] Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One Of Three} <FNVW@AltUsenetKooks.com> - 2012-08-03 02:51 +0000
          Paul Derbyshire accepts his BUA nom <Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal  <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-03 03:04 +0000
        Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> "Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar" <ytjohnnyd@gmail.com> - 2012-08-03 03:48 +0000
          Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <fnvw@databasix.com> - 2012-08-03 00:10 -0500
        Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <fnvw@databasix.com> - 2012-08-02 22:52 -0500
          Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-08-03 04:02 +0000

#16959 — Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks."

one busted puppet wrote: 

[...]

>SPNAK!!!!!
>
>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep poking 
>holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?

Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me>
SPNAK!!

Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes!
Your message is lost, I definitely do not believe any
of your bluster now.

PLONK on Seamus

-- 

followup to set appropriately

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#16961

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa Espírito wrote:

> one busted puppet wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>SPNAK!!!!!
>>
>>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep
>>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?
> 
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
> <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
> 
> Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is lost,
> I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now.

Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies 
poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.

There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's Eternal 
September's fault. I don't know what went wrong, but that message was 
"stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm assuming 
that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but posted it anyway, 
and Agent made some automatic retries before finally deciding it had 
successfully posted the article. Regardless, it was not intentional on my 
part and is hardly comparable to your own history of giant EMPs -- of 
which you have another tonight, I note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, 
one in eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five-
group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about six.

> PLONK on Seamus

Coward.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17019 — NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks

DENIED, Derbyshite. 

> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa Espírito wrote:
> 
>> one busted puppet wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>>>SPNAK!!!!!
>>>
>>>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep
>>>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?
>> 
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>> <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>> 
>> Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is lost,

AUK has an award for this.

>> I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now.
>
> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies 
> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.

Liar. 
 
> There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's Eternal 
> September's fault.

That's lame, Paula, even for you - blaming the server you're abusing when you  
screw up. 

> I don't know what went wrong, 

<chortle>

<See if you can pick the classic Derbyshire trademark in the text below> 
> but that message was 
> "stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm assuming 
> that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but posted it anyway, 
> and Agent made some automatic retries before finally deciding it had 
> successfully posted the article. Regardless, it was not intentional on my 
> part and is hardly comparable to your own history of giant EMPs -- of 
> which you have another tonight, I note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, 
> one in eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five-
> group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about six.
> 
>> PLONK on Seamus
> 
> Coward.

Paula, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned your 
other awards of course, but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If you were 
any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to sleep. 


Busted Urinal Award

The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and stinks up 
the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.

Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has been 
cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.  Seconds? 


-- 
<T><A><H><B><B><F><V><T><G><G><T><O><U> - "Vile Little Fucker" #1
If you want to see something lamer than John Edward Kook's Aratzio frogeries, 
                   check out Scatboi's forgeries.

Anonopussy gets kicked to the kerb in <0xKRr.45217$7y4.27784@newsfe23.iad>
                         and again in <y4LRr.40166$lt3.7151@newsfe18.iad>

Paul Derbyshire and socks get spanked - <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17020 — NOMINATION - Account Banned for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

On 02/08/2012 9:36 PM, This account has been banned almost everywhere wrote:
[delusion-filter run]
> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies
>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.
>
> Liar.

Proof?

> P****, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned your
> other awards of course,

Admission that your imaginary nemesis has *not* earned CNoTM, Foam Duck, 
Circle Jerk, or any other non-BUA award, noted. You've contradicted 
several of your earlier posts at once this time. Feeling stupid yet?

> but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If you were
> any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to sleep.

Death threat, noted. Laughable inability to actually carry out threat, 
also noted.

> Busted Urinal Award
>
> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and stinks up
> the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.

Judging by how large a proportion of your posts are being blackholed by 
numerous servers (not just Google) nowadays, the technically clueful 
seem to have unanimously decided that *you're* clogging and stinking up 
the joint.

And on that basis ... NOMINATION: Account Banned for Busted Urinal. Any 
seconds?

> Evidence for D<SCCCCRATCH>'s eligibility for stinking up the joint has been
> cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.

A sock puppet of a notable kook. Hardly a credible source.

> Seconds?

Nomination denied, Offishul AUK Spankling.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17021 — Re: NOMINATION - Account Banned for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

kensi, in <news:jvfd20$nkh$1@speranza.aioe.org> did thusly write:

> On 02/08/2012 9:36 PM, This account has been banned almost everywhere wrote:
> [delusion-filter run]
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies
>>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.
>>
>> Liar.
> 
> Proof?
> 
>> P****, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned your
>> other awards of course,
> 
> Admission that your imaginary nemesis has *not* earned CNoTM, Foam Duck, 
> Circle Jerk, or any other non-BUA award, noted. You've contradicted 
> several of your earlier posts at once this time. Feeling stupid yet?
> 
>> but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If you were
>> any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to sleep.
> 
> Death threat, noted. Laughable inability to actually carry out threat, 
> also noted.
> 
>> Busted Urinal Award
>>
>> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and stinks up
>> the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
> 
> Judging by how large a proportion of your posts are being blackholed by 
> numerous servers (not just Google) nowadays, the technically clueful 
> seem to have unanimously decided that *you're* clogging and stinking up 
> the joint.
> 
> And on that basis ... NOMINATION: Account Banned for Busted Urinal. Any 
> seconds?

Seconded.

>> Evidence for D<SCCCCRATCH>'s eligibility for stinking up the joint has been
>> cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.
> 
> A sock puppet of a notable kook. Hardly a credible source.
> 
>> Seconds?
> 
> Nomination denied, Offishul AUK Spankling.

Why are all his posts not showing up? On all the servers I've tried,
none of his posts are there tonight. It's like he got the creeping
Usenet Death Penalty, dying a little more each day. I noticed it
started last night, some of his posts didn't show up, others did. Now,
none of them show up, on any of the 4 reading servers I use.

Won't be long before he realizes he's an impotent, wild-eyed kook
screaming on an empty street corner.

Is his server filtering out his illucid screed even before it can
propagate? Oh, the irony if that's true... Busted Urinal, indeed.

<sniggle>

-- 
/\                       Properly known as James
  \  /\         THERE IS NO CABAL -- LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
   \/  \     The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17022 — Paul Derbyshire accepts his BUA nom <Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

Paul G. Derbyshire AKA kensi <kensi_kensington@zoonoses.invalid> wrote: 

> On 02/08/2012 9:36 PM, This account has been banned almost everywhere
> wrote: [delusion-filter run]
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies
>>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.
>>
>> Liar.
> 
> Proof?
> 
>> Paula, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned
>> your other awards of course,
> 
> Admission that your imaginary nemesis has *not* earned CNoTM, Foam Duck,
> Circle Jerk, or any other non-BUA award, noted. You've contradicted 
> several of your earlier posts at once this time. 

Poor Paula; the spanking is getting to him.  

> Feeling stupid yet?

No.  Are you, Paula?

>> but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If you were
>> any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to sleep.
> 
> Death threat, noted. Laughable inability to actually carry out threat, 
> also noted.

Feeling paranoid too, Paula? 

>> Busted Urinal Award
>>
>> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
>> stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
> 
> Judging by how large a proportion of your posts are being blackholed by 
> numerous servers (not just Google) nowadays, the technically clueful 
> seem to have unanimously decided that *you're* clogging and stinking up 
> the joint.

Where is your evidence, Paula?  Your delusions do not count. 

 
> And on that basis ... NOMINATION: Account Banned for Busted Urinal. Any 
> seconds<SLAP>

Paul Derbyshire, the FNVW has disenfranchised you.  You cannot nominate, 
vote, or second any legitimate AUK award. 
 
>> Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has
>> been cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.
> 
> A sock puppet of a notable kook. Hardly a credible source.

The MIDs of your posts are the evidence, Paula. 
 
>> Seconds?
> 
> Nomination denied<SPANK>

Denial DENIED, Paula. 
 

-- 
<T><A><H><B><B><F><V><T><G><G><T><O><U> - "Vile Little Fucker" #1
If you want to see something lamer than John Edward Kook's Aratzio frogeries, 
                   check out Scatboi's forgeries.

Anonopussy gets kicked to the kerb in <0xKRr.45217$7y4.27784@newsfe23.iad>
                         and again in <y4LRr.40166$lt3.7151@newsfe18.iad>

Paul Derbyshire and socks get spanked - <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17025 — Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms
Of Use <laughing@u.kook> wrote in
news:YWFSr.45394$7y4.21889@newsfe23.iad: 

> Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
> 
> DENIED, Derbyshite. 
> 
>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa Espírito wrote:
>> 
>>> one busted puppet wrote:
>>> 
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>>SPNAK!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep
>>>>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?
>>> 
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> 
>>> Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is
>>> lost, 
> 
> AUK has an award for this.
> 
>>> I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now.
>>
>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies 
>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence",
>> kooky. 
> 
> Liar. 
>  
>> There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's
>> Eternal September's fault.
> 
> That's lame, Paula, even for you - blaming the server you're abusing
> when you  screw up. 
> 
>> I don't know what went wrong, 
> 
> <chortle>
> 
> <See if you can pick the classic Derbyshire trademark in the text
> below> 
>> but that message was 
>> "stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm
>> assuming that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but
>> posted it anyway, and Agent made some automatic retries before
>> finally deciding it had successfully posted the article. Regardless,
>> it was not intentional on my part and is hardly comparable to your
>> own history of giant EMPs -- of which you have another tonight, I
>> note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, one in
>> eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five- 
>> group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about
>> six. 
>> 
>>> PLONK on Seamus
>> 
>> Coward.
> 
> Paula, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned
> your other awards of course, but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If
> you were any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to
> sleep. 
> 
> 
> Busted Urinal Award
> 
> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
> stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
> 
> Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has
> been cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.  Seconds? 

Seconded with much mirth


-- 

You there: Fuck off.  And when you get there, fuck off from there, too.  Then fuck off some more.  Keep 
fucking off until you get back here. Then fuck off again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17030 — Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 03:48:17 +0000 (UTC), "Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar" <ytjohnnyd@gmail.com> wrote in
<XnsA0A3D3A4588FAScourgeOfUsenet@208.90.168.18>:

>This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms
>Of Use <laughing@u.kook> wrote in
>news:YWFSr.45394$7y4.21889@newsfe23.iad: 
>
>> Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
>> 
>> DENIED, Derbyshite. 
>> 
>>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa Espírito wrote:
>>> 
>>>> one busted puppet wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> [...]
>>>> 
>>>>>SPNAK!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep
>>>>>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?
>>>> 
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>>> <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>>> 
>>>> Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is
>>>> lost, 
>> 
>> AUK has an award for this.
>> 
>>>> I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now.
>>>
>>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies 
>>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence",
>>> kooky. 
>> 
>> Liar. 
>>  
>>> There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's
>>> Eternal September's fault.
>> 
>> That's lame, Paula, even for you - blaming the server you're abusing
>> when you  screw up. 
>> 
>>> I don't know what went wrong, 
>> 
>> <chortle>
>> 
>> <See if you can pick the classic Derbyshire trademark in the text
>> below> 
>>> but that message was 
>>> "stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm
>>> assuming that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but
>>> posted it anyway, and Agent made some automatic retries before
>>> finally deciding it had successfully posted the article. Regardless,
>>> it was not intentional on my part and is hardly comparable to your
>>> own history of giant EMPs -- of which you have another tonight, I
>>> note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, one in
>>> eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five- 
>>> group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about
>>> six. 
>>> 
>>>> PLONK on Seamus
>>> 
>>> Coward.
>> 
>> Paula, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned
>> your other awards of course, but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If
>> you were any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to
>> sleep. 
>> 
>> 
>> Busted Urinal Award
>> 
>> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
>> stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
>> 
>> Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has
>> been cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.  Seconds? 
>
>Seconded with much mirth

Accepted, with even more mirth.

-- 
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17027 — Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:36:56 GMT, This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups
Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> wrote in <YWFSr.45394$7y4.21889@newsfe23.iad>:

>Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
>
>DENIED, Derbyshite. 
>
>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa Espírito wrote:
>> 
>>> one busted puppet wrote:
>>> 
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>>SPNAK!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep
>>>>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky?
>>> 
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdgiv$vlv$4@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdh3i$vlv$6@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhc5$vlv$7@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhd3$vm6$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhei$a9v$1@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID:
>>> <jvdhm1$b9n$2@dont-email.me> SPNAK!!
>>> 
>>> Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is lost,
>
>AUK has an award for this.
>
>>> I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now.
>>
>> Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies 
>> poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky.
>
>Liar. 
> 
>> There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's Eternal 
>> September's fault.
>
>That's lame, Paula, even for you - blaming the server you're abusing when you  
>screw up. 
>
>> I don't know what went wrong, 
>
><chortle>
>
><See if you can pick the classic Derbyshire trademark in the text below> 
>> but that message was 
>> "stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm assuming 
>> that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but posted it anyway, 
>> and Agent made some automatic retries before finally deciding it had 
>> successfully posted the article. Regardless, it was not intentional on my 
>> part and is hardly comparable to your own history of giant EMPs -- of 
>> which you have another tonight, I note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, 
>> one in eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five-
>> group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about six.
>> 
>>> PLONK on Seamus
>> 
>> Coward.
>
>Paula, you have earned this one.  That's not to say you've also earned your 
>other awards of course, but you've out-lamed yourself here.  If you were 
>any lamer, we'd have to take you to the vet and put you to sleep. 
>
>
>Busted Urinal Award
>
>The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and stinks up 
>the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
>
>Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has been 
>cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.  Seconds? 

Nomination accepted.
-- 
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17029 — Re: NOMINATION - Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for August Busted Urinal <was Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks.">

Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:52:15 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Booze Wrangler 
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:36:56 GMT, This account has been banned because
> it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> wrote in
> <YWFSr.45394$7y4.21889@newsfe23.iad>:
> 
>> Busted Urinal Award
>>
>> The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on Usenet. One who clogs and
>> stinks up the joint like a busted urinal, you could say.
>>
>> Evidence for Derbyshire's eligibility for stinking up the joint has
>> been cited by 'Capa Espírito' above.  Seconds?
> 
> Nomination accepted.

Acceptance denied, Drunken Kook Masquerading As Ex-FNVW.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web