Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22644 > unrolled thread

Boolean

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  Boolean odie4penname@gmail.com - 2013-02-28 23:22 -0800
    Re: Boolean JLP <JLP@jlp.com> - 2013-03-01 09:18 +0100
      Re: Boolean odie4penname@gmail.com - 2013-03-01 06:42 -0800
        Re: Boolean Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-03-01 10:25 -0500
      Re: Boolean Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-03-01 11:21 -0800
        Re: Boolean JLP <JLP@jlp.com> - 2013-03-04 09:12 +0100
          Re: Boolean Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 11:38 -0800
            Re: Boolean Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 11:45 -0800
              Re: Boolean Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 15:06 -0800
                Re: Boolean JLP <JLP@jlp.com> - 2013-03-05 11:45 +0100
            Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-06 20:19 -0500
              Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-07 08:50 +0000
                Re: Boolean Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-03-07 09:58 -0800
                  Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-07 19:24 +0100
                    Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-07 19:11 +0000
                  Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-07 19:21 +0000
                    Re: Boolean Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-03-12 09:10 -0700
                      Re: Boolean Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-03-12 09:54 -0700
                        Re: Boolean markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-03-12 10:04 -0700
                          Re: Boolean Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-03-12 12:02 -0700
                Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-07 13:50 -0500
                  Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-07 19:00 +0000
                    Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-07 14:10 -0500
                      Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-07 19:25 +0000
                Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-07 13:52 -0500
                  Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-07 23:27 +0100
                    Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-07 17:46 -0500
                      Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-08 09:22 +0000
                    Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-08 08:16 +0000
                      Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-08 10:30 +0100
                        Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-08 15:00 +0000
                          Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-09 01:37 +0100
                            Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-09 08:40 +0000
                              Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-09 09:54 +0100
                                Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-09 09:08 +0000
                                  Re: Boolean Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-03-09 11:38 +0100
                                    Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-09 12:01 +0000
    Re: Boolean odie4penname@gmail.com - 2013-03-01 07:50 -0800
      Re: Boolean Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-03-01 11:14 -0500
    Re: Boolean Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-03-01 09:08 -0800
      Re: Boolean Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-03-01 18:26 +0100
        Re: Boolean lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-01 19:37 +0000
          Re: Boolean Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-03-01 21:44 +0100
          Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-01 18:34 -0500
        Re: Boolean Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-01 18:33 -0500
        Re: Boolean Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-03-01 17:48 -0800
          Re: Boolean Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-03-02 04:03 +0100

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#22792

On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 3/4/2013 2:38 PM, Lew wrote:
>>> JLP wrote:
>>>> Lew a écrit :
>>>>> JLP wrote:
>>>>>> Nota : Class names must start with a capital letter
>>>>> Not "must", "should".
>
> [snip]
>
>>> This is not a question of knowing English but of knowing technical
>>> terms.
>
> Must and should are not 'technical terms' for goodness sake.
>
> "Technical terminology is the specialized vocabulary of any field"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_terminology.
>
> Must and should are not "the specialized vocabulary" of any field, are
> they?

These terms have a much more precise definition in IT specifications
than they have in plain English.

>> Just in case:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>
> And of course you NEVER use these words incorrectly do you.

Confusing must and should?

Probably not today.

But that is not really the point.

The point is that at some point in time we got it right because
somebody told us or pointed us to a good source of information.

Those that learn when they are told something gain knowledge - those
that gets offended does not.

> Why do you people consistently rubbish posters who's first language is
> not English.

This is not really about English. The words was spelled correctly
and used grammatically correct (as far as I can tell).

But the way they were used to describe how to write a specific
programming language (Java) was not correct.

It would have been pretty bad if nobody had explained
what was correct and what was not.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22794

On 07/03/13 18:50, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> On 3/4/2013 2:38 PM, Lew wrote:
>>>> JLP wrote:
>>>>> Lew a écrit :
>>>>>> JLP wrote:
>>>>>>> Nota : Class names must start with a capital letter
>>>>>> Not "must", "should".
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> This is not a question of knowing English but of knowing technical
>>>> terms.
>>
>> Must and should are not 'technical terms' for goodness sake.
>>
>> "Technical terminology is the specialized vocabulary of any field"
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_terminology.
>>
>> Must and should are not "the specialized vocabulary" of any field, are
>> they?
>
> These terms have a much more precise definition in IT specifications
> than they have in plain English.
>
>>> Just in case:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>>
>> And of course you NEVER use these words incorrectly do you.
>
> Confusing must and should?
>
> Probably not today.
>
> But that is not really the point.
>
> The point is that at some point in time we got it right because
> somebody told us or pointed us to a good source of information.
>
> Those that learn when they are told something gain knowledge - those
> that gets offended does not.

those that *get* offended *do* not

>> Why do you people consistently rubbish posters who's first language is
>> not English.
>
> This is not really about English. The words was spelled correctly

The words *were* spelled correctly

> and used grammatically correct (as far as I can tell).

and used *in a grammatically correct way*

> But the way they were used to describe how to write a specific
> programming language (Java) was not correct.

must and should are not keywords in the Java programming language.

> It would have been pretty bad if nobody had explained
> what was correct and what was not.

Well quite (see above)

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22795

On 3/7/2013 2:00 PM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 07/03/13 18:50, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> But the way they were used to describe how to write a specific
>> programming language (Java) was not correct.
>
> must and should are not keywords in the Java programming language.

No.

But correct terminology for Java is not limited to Java keywords,
so that means nothing.

>> It would have been pretty bad if nobody had explained
>> what was correct and what was not.
>
> Well quite

So stop whining about it!

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22802

On 07/03/13 19:10, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 3/7/2013 2:00 PM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 07/03/13 18:50, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> But the way they were used to describe how to write a specific
>>> programming language (Java) was not correct.
>>
>> must and should are not keywords in the Java programming language.
>
> No.
>
> But correct terminology for Java is not limited to Java keywords,
> so that means nothing.
>
>>> It would have been pretty bad if nobody had explained
>>> what was correct and what was not.
>>
>> Well quite
>
> So stop whining about it!

ROFL

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22793

On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Just in case:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>
> And of course you NEVER use these words incorrectly do you.
>
> Why do you people consistently rubbish posters who's first language is
> not English. Does it make you feel good? are your sad little lives so
> empty that you need to project your misery onto others? Really, it is
> simply not acceptable in this day and age.

And given that:
- I never criticize someone for not writing correct English
- You do
  then the above is just so hypocritical ...

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22806

2013-03-07 19:52, Arne Vajhøj skrev:
> On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> Just in case:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>>
>> And of course you NEVER use these words incorrectly do you.
>>
>> Why do you people consistently rubbish posters who's first language is
>> not English. Does it make you feel good? are your sad little lives so
>> empty that you need to project your misery onto others? Really, it is
>> simply not acceptable in this day and age.
> 
> And given that:
> - I never criticize someone for not writing correct English
> - You do
>  then the above is just so hypocritical ...
> 

He seems to be on some sort of crusade against you and Lew, especially,
and he includes me because I dare speak up on your behalf. I mentioned
your apparent problems with verbs and adverbs, but he ignored that in
his condescending and insulting reply. He thinks he has the right to
insult us, from some imagined moral high ground. I think he is just a jerk.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22807

On 3/7/2013 5:27 PM, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-07 19:52, Arne Vajhøj skrev:
>> On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> Just in case:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>>>
>>> And of course you NEVER use these words incorrectly do you.
>>>
>>> Why do you people consistently rubbish posters who's first language is
>>> not English. Does it make you feel good? are your sad little lives so
>>> empty that you need to project your misery onto others? Really, it is
>>> simply not acceptable in this day and age.
>>
>> And given that:
>> - I never criticize someone for not writing correct English
>> - You do
>>   then the above is just so hypocritical ...
>>
>
> He seems to be on some sort of crusade against you and Lew, especially,
> and he includes me because I dare speak up on your behalf. I mentioned
> your apparent problems with verbs and adverbs, but he ignored that in
> his condescending and insulting reply. He thinks he has the right to
> insult us, from some imagined moral high ground. I think he is just a jerk.

He is not the first of that type here. And he will not be the last either.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22818

On 07/03/13 22:46, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 3/7/2013 5:27 PM, Lars Enderin wrote:
>> 2013-03-07 19:52, Arne Vajhøj skrev:

[snip]

>> He seems to be on some sort of crusade against you and Lew, especially,
>> and he includes me because I dare speak up on your behalf. I mentioned
>> your apparent problems with verbs and adverbs, but he ignored that in
>> his condescending and insulting reply. He thinks he has the right to
>> insult us, from some imagined moral high ground. I think he is just a
>> jerk.
>
> He is not the first of that type here. And he will not be the last either.

Remember what we said about the weird-o-meter Arne

You are stoking it up nicely

===== weird-o-meter =====
low | medium | high | higher | highest
***********

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22815

On 07/03/13 22:27, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-07 19:52, Arne Vajhøj skrev:
>> On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

[snip]

> He seems to be on some sort of crusade against you and Lew, especially,
> and he includes me because I dare speak up on your behalf. I mentioned
> your apparent problems with verbs and adverbs, but he ignored that in
> his condescending and insulting reply. He thinks he has the right to
> insult us, from some imagined moral high ground. I think he is just a jerk.

You don't like the taste of your own medicine do you, your sort never do.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22819

2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
> On 07/03/13 22:27, Lars Enderin wrote:
>> 2013-03-07 19:52, Arne Vajhøj skrev:
>>> On 3/7/2013 3:50 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> He seems to be on some sort of crusade against you and Lew, especially,
>> and he includes me because I dare speak up on your behalf. I mentioned
>> your apparent problems with verbs and adverbs, but he ignored that in
>> his condescending and insulting reply. He thinks he has the right to
>> insult us, from some imagined moral high ground. I think he is just a
>> jerk.
> 
> You don't like the taste of your own medicine do you, your sort never do.
> 

BS. I never prescribed or dispensed any "medicine". And you have no
business labelling me with "your sort". You have no idea what I am like.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22823

On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:

[snip]

> BS.

Now now Lars ... don't use 'foul abbreviations'

That was a classic BTW, and very very funny, we still laugh about that 
one you simpleton.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22836

2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
>> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> BS.
> 
> Now now Lars ... don't use 'foul abbreviations'
> 
> That was a classic BTW, and very very funny, we still laugh about that
> one you simpleton.
> 

You obviously have no real argument, since you resort to name-calling.
You are a moron.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22841

On 09/03/13 00:37, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
>> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> BS.
>>
>> Now now Lars ... don't use 'foul abbreviations'
>>
>> That was a classic BTW, and very very funny, we still laugh about that
>> one you simpleton.
>>
>
> You obviously have no real argument, since you resort to name-calling.
> You are a moron.

Lars, Lars, just listen to yourself.

"... since you resort to name-calling. You are a moron"

You are resorting to name calling Lars.
What does that make you ... think about it.

Logical deduction should lead you to only one conclusion.
Have you figured it out yet?

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22843

2013-03-09 09:40, lipska the kat skrev:
> On 09/03/13 00:37, Lars Enderin wrote:
>> 2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
>>> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>>> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> BS.
>>>
>>> Now now Lars ... don't use 'foul abbreviations'
>>>
>>> That was a classic BTW, and very very funny, we still laugh about that
>>> one you simpleton.
>>>
>>
>> You obviously have no real argument, since you resort to name-calling.
>> You are a moron.
> 
> Lars, Lars, just listen to yourself.
> 
> "... since you resort to name-calling. You are a moron"
> 
> You are resorting to name calling Lars.
> What does that make you ... think about it.
> 
> Logical deduction should lead you to only one conclusion.
> Have you figured it out yet?

There was nothing concrete in your reply, so I called you on it. You
behave like a troll or moron, so you probably are one. You are a
troublemaker. You have called me names and given me condescending,
slighting, and insulting replies avoiding the actual issues, for no
reason. I deeply resent that.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22844

On 09/03/13 08:54, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-09 09:40, lipska the kat skrev:
>> On 09/03/13 00:37, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>> 2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>>>> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>>

[snip]

> There was nothing concrete in your reply, so I called you on it. You
> behave like a troll or moron, so you probably are one. You are a
> troublemaker. You have called me names and given me condescending,
> slighting, and insulting replies avoiding the actual issues, for no
> reason. I deeply resent that.

I'll tell you what Lars, I'll stop 'insulting' you when you stop 
defending the indefensible e.g the appalling behavior of certain members 
of this community. If you mind your own business I will have no reason 
to 'insult' you. Lew and Arne and the others are more than capable of 
defending themselves, I'm not sure why you so frequently feel the need 
to add your voice to the din.

Oh BTW, I have nothing against Arne and Lew and a few others, I don't 
know them so how could I. what I object to is their behavior towards new 
posters.

I've explained this multiple times now, I'm not sure what it is you 
don't understand.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22845

2013-03-09 10:08, lipska the kat skrev:
> On 09/03/13 08:54, Lars Enderin wrote:
>> 2013-03-09 09:40, lipska the kat skrev:
>>> On 09/03/13 00:37, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>>> 2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>>> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>>>>> 2013-03-08 09:16, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>>>
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> There was nothing concrete in your reply, so I called you on it. You
>> behave like a troll or moron, so you probably are one. You are a
>> troublemaker. You have called me names and given me condescending,
>> slighting, and insulting replies avoiding the actual issues, for no
>> reason. I deeply resent that.
> 
> I'll tell you what Lars, I'll stop 'insulting' you when you stop
> defending the indefensible e.g the appalling behavior of certain members
> of this community. If you mind your own business I will have no reason
> to 'insult' you. Lew and Arne and the others are more than capable of
> defending themselves, I'm not sure why you so frequently feel the need
> to add your voice to the din.
> 
> Oh BTW, I have nothing against Arne and Lew and a few others, I don't
> know them so how could I. what I object to is their behavior towards new
> posters.
> 
> I've explained this multiple times now, I'm not sure what it is you
> don't understand.
> 

I don't understand why you think you have a right to insult me because I
don't accept your views on what Arne, Lew and others are doing. Why
shouldn't I speak up? Your views are heavily biased. You are becoming
more and more like a certain copious and opiniated poster in another
newsgroup. Anyway, Lew has you binned, I think.

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22851

On 09/03/13 10:38, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2013-03-09 10:08, lipska the kat skrev:
>> On 09/03/13 08:54, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>> 2013-03-09 09:40, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>> On 09/03/13 00:37, Lars Enderin wrote:
>>>>> 2013-03-08 16:00, lipska the kat skrev:
>>>>>> On 08/03/13 09:30, Lars Enderin wrote:

[snip]

> I don't understand why you think you have a right to insult me because I
> don't accept your views on what Arne, Lew and others are doing.Why
> shouldn't I speak up? Your views are heavily biased. You are becoming
> more and more like a certain copious and opiniated poster in another
> newsgroup. Anyway, Lew has you binned, I think.

If Bloch has me killfiled then I consider that a badge of honor.
I don't use them myself. If you are delicate enough to be offended by 
anything you read on Usenet then I suggest you should probably do 
something else with your time.

Hey, I've an idea, why don't you do the same as Bloch, at least I won't 
have to listen to your bleating and whining every time I pull them up 
about their ignorant and condescending behavior.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22651

Thanks all. Yes, the assignment is simply to show it works correct. This is my second time working with BluJ. I am just starting to learn.


I am not sure if this part is correct:

public static void main(String [] args)
    {
        int x=1;

-Should it be int num=1;  ?

Here is more details of my assignment. I hope this helps in understanding in case I was vague in my prior posts:


invoke this method for the following values for the num parameter (in the specified order)
You can do this directly from main or from some other method / methods invoked by main.
When the method is invoked, one of the calling methods must output the appropriate
message.

In other words:
 if we passed the value
0 as an argument to num,
 it would display this message (on a line by itself):

 isNumberOdd is false for the number 0


On Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:22:49 PM UTC-8, odie4p...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> 
> 
> I'd like to make sure I have done this correct. I am using BluJ:
> 
> 
> 
> Create a public boolean method named
> 
> MynumberisOdd that takes an integer parameter named 
> 
> num and returns a boolean value indicating whether num is Odd.
> 
> 
> 
> The method should check if num is odd and return true when the number is odd and false when the number is even
> 
> 
> 
> Here is what I have:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> public class example
> 
> 
> 
> {
> 
>     public static void main(String [] args)
> 
>     {
> 
>         int x=1;
> 
> 
> 
>     }
> 
> 
> 
>     public boolean isNumberOdd (int num)
> 
>     {
> 
>         return num%2 !=0;
> 
>         
> 
> 
> 
>         
> 
>     }
> 
> }

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22652

On 3/1/2013 10:50 AM, odie4penname@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks all. Yes, the assignment is simply to show it works correct. This is my second time working with BluJ. I am just starting to learn.

     For future reference, comp.lang.java.programmer is (in theory)
for questions more advanced than yours, and the answers you see
here are likely to presuppose more knowledge of Java than a beginner
probably has.  That is, a lot of the answers will make no sense to
you because they'll assume you have mastered Lesson Eighteen when
you're still struggling with Lesson Three.

     There's another newsgroup, comp.lang.java.help, that is (again,
in theory) more suitable for those who are just getting started.
I suggest you ask questions about forthcoming assignments there
rather than here.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22654

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:22:49 -0800 (PST), odie4penname@gmail.com
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>Here is what I have:

have you tested it? 

Your method can be static.  That simplifies things.
 
see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/modulus.html#EVEN
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com
One thing I love about having a website, is that when I complain about
something, I only have to do it once. It saves me endless hours of 
grumbling.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web