Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22370 > unrolled thread

Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-19 22:04 +0100
    Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 13:19 -0800
    Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-19 13:42 -0800
      Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 14:27 -0800
        Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 09:05 +0100
          Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-02-20 08:40 +0000
            Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 09:46 +0100
              Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-02-20 09:19 +0000
              Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 08:05 -0800
                Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 17:48 +0100
                  Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-02-20 10:05 -0800
                    Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 19:53 +0100
                      Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-22 15:11 -0500
                  Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-02-20 20:47 +0100
                    Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 22:18 +0100
                      Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 22:21 +0100
                        Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 22:25 +0100
                          Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2013-02-21 00:38 +0100
                      Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-02-21 09:43 -0800
                      Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-22 15:18 -0500
          Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-22 15:10 -0500
    Re: Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-20 09:01 +0100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#22370 — Where is JDK 1.7_15 going on Mac

Dear All,

The auto installer said it just installed
JDK 1.7_15 on my machnine. But where is it
going, where do I find the .jars etc?

Bye

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#22371

Jan Burse wrote:
> The auto installer said it just installed
> JDK 1.7_15 on my machnine. But where is it
> going, where do I find the .jars etc?

S ls -l $(which java)
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  74 Dec 12 11:01 /usr/bin/java@ -> /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/Current/Commands/java
$ ls -l /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
...

-- 
Lew
Build a man a fire and you warm him for an hour.
Set a man on fire and you warm him for the rest of his life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22373

On 2/19/2013 1:04 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The auto installer said it just installed
> JDK 1.7_15 on my machnine. But where is it
> going, where do I find the .jars etc?

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Brenden>where java
C:\Windows\System32\java.exe
c:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.6.0_24\bin\java.exe

Hmm, not sure why that's Java 6, I might have to check my path.  But you 
get the idea.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22375

markspace wrote:
> Jan Burse wrote:
>> The auto installer said it just installed
>> JDK 1.7_15 on my machnine. But where is it
>> going, where do I find the .jars etc?
> 
> Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
> Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

For when your Mac is running Windows.

Not your fault, really, as the OP neglected to repeat the information in the body of their post.

> C:\Users\Brenden>where java
> C:\Windows\System32\java.exe
> c:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jdk1.6.0_24\bin\java.exe
> 
> Hmm, not sure why that's Java 6, I might have to check my path.  But you 
> get the idea.

Java 6u41 is the current Java 6. Yours is woefully behind, and missing patches for several 
infamous security issues.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22385

Lew schrieb:
> Not your fault, really, as the OP neglected to
> repeat the information in the body of their post.

Corr.:
Not your fault, really, as Jan neglected to
repeat the information in the body of his post.

OP my ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22386

On 20/02/13 08:05, Jan Burse wrote:
> Lew schrieb:
>> Not your fault, really, as the OP neglected to
>> repeat the information in the body of their post.
>
> Corr.:
> Not your fault, really, as Jan neglected to
> repeat the information in the body of his post.
>
> OP my ass.

OP stands for 'Original Poster'

You posted the Original Post
ergo you are the Original Poster
ergo you are the OP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergo

Just FYI :-)

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22387

lipska the kat schrieb:
> On 20/02/13 08:05, Jan Burse wrote:
>> Lew schrieb:
>>> Not your fault, really, as the OP neglected to
>>> repeat the information in the body of their post.
>>
>> Corr.:
>> Not your fault, really, as Jan neglected to
>> repeat the information in the body of his post.
>>
>> OP my ass.
>
> OP stands for 'Original Poster'

Yes I know. Habits from stackoverflow etc.
meta-forum adapted to non-meta forum. I
don't approve these bad habits.

http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/grumpy-cat-04.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22388

On 20/02/13 08:46, Jan Burse wrote:
> lipska the kat schrieb:
>> On 20/02/13 08:05, Jan Burse wrote:

[snip]

> http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/grumpy-cat-04.jpg

heh heh, now THAT'S a grumpy cat

lipska (not grumpy)

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22390

Jan Burse wrote:
> lipska the kat schrieb:
>> Jan Burse wrote:
>>> Lew schrieb:
>>>> Not your fault, really, as the OP neglected to
>>>> repeat the information in the body of their post.
>
>>> Corr. [sic]:
>>> Not your fault, really, as Jan neglected to
>>> repeat the information in the body of his post.
>>>
>>> OP my ass.

Jeez, dude, take a chill pill.

>> OP stands for 'Original Poster'
 
> Yes I know. Habits from stackoverflow etc.
> meta-forum adapted to non-meta forum. I
> don't approve these bad habits.

What "bad habits"? "OP" has been around as an abbreviation on Usenet 
since forever.

> http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/grumpy-cat-04.jpg

As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't 
like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22393

Lew schrieb:
> As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't
> like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.

Hey NOP, don't call me OP.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22394

On 2/20/13 8:48 AM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Lew schrieb:
>> As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't
>> like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.
>
> Hey NOP, don't call me OP.

Wow, the term OP is useful and has been around on Usenet since before 
the WWW was mainstream.  It's not a pejorative.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22396

Daniel Pitts schrieb:
> On 2/20/13 8:48 AM, Jan Burse wrote:
>> Lew schrieb:
>>> As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't
>>> like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.
>>
>> Hey NOP, don't call me OP.
>
> Wow, the term OP is useful and has been around on Usenet since before
> the WWW was mainstream.  It's not a pejorative.

Hey OP+4, I am talking to OP+1.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22461

On 2/20/2013 1:53 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Daniel Pitts schrieb:
>> On 2/20/13 8:48 AM, Jan Burse wrote:
>>> Lew schrieb:
>>>> As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't
>>>> like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.
>>>
>>> Hey NOP, don't call me OP.
>>
>> Wow, the term OP is useful and has been around on Usenet since before
>> the WWW was mainstream.  It's not a pejorative.
>
> Hey OP+4, I am talking to OP+1.

Those are not common.

Not even useful.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22397

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:48:19 +0100, Jan Burse wrote:

> Lew schrieb:
>> As the OP, you get to have your on-topic points addressed. If you don't
>> like "OP" as an abbreviation, go somewhere where it's not common.
> Hey NOP, don't call me OP.

Do you have some weird issues you are trying to talk about ? You are acting
as if you were attacked somehow, when you absolutely weren't (until you
started making an ass of yourself).

Referring to the original poster of a thread as the OP is something that
has been around since before there was such a thing as web forums, let
alone stackoverflow. But even if it had come from SO, there would still be
no reason for your baselessly hostile reaction to a term that is nothing
but descriptive, and by no stretch of the imagination could be considered
derogatory.

Liebe Gruesse,
		Joerg

-- 
Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider
ungelesen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22398

Joerg Meier schrieb:
> Referring to the original poster of a thread as the OP is something that
> has been around since before there was such a thing as web forums, let
> alone stackoverflow. But even if it had come from SO, there would still be
> no reason for your baselessly hostile reaction to a term that is nothing
> but descriptive, and by no stretch of the imagination could be considered
> derogatory.

Well you can call an employee working in a bank a clerk,
or a stewerdess from an airplane, etc..

But why on earth do I use a plain e-mail for posting here?
Sure not to be called OP.

I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
of OP+1 (i.e. Lew, I am not that lazy) to use OP.

Bye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22399

Jan Burse schrieb:
> I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
Corr.:
derogatory, disrespectful, pejorative, etc.. you name it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22400

Jan Burse schrieb:
> Jan Burse schrieb:
>> I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
> Corr.:
> derogatory, disrespectful, pejorative, etc.. you name it.
Corr.Corr.:
I don't mourn that it is derogartory. It is just lazy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22401

2013-02-20 22:25, Jan Burse skrev:
> Jan Burse schrieb:
>> Jan Burse schrieb:
>>> I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
>> Corr.:
>> derogatory, disrespectful, pejorative, etc.. you name it.
> Corr.Corr.:
> I don't mourn that it is derogartory. It is just lazy

You are being ridiculous, and what do you mean by "mourn" here?

-- 
Lars Enderin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22422

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:18:55 +0100, Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
wrote:

>Joerg Meier schrieb:
>> Referring to the original poster of a thread as the OP is something that
>> has been around since before there was such a thing as web forums, let
>> alone stackoverflow. But even if it had come from SO, there would still be
>> no reason for your baselessly hostile reaction to a term that is nothing
>> but descriptive, and by no stretch of the imagination could be considered
>> derogatory.
>
>Well you can call an employee working in a bank a clerk,
>or a stewerdess from an airplane, etc..
>
>But why on earth do I use a plain e-mail for posting here?
>Sure not to be called OP.

     So?  One reason to use "OP" is because one is not sure which
pronoun to use.  Your name is an example of this.  "Jan" is both a
male name and a female name.
>
>I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
>of OP+1 (i.e. Lew, I am not that lazy) to use OP.

     Nope.  It is useful.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22462

On 2/20/2013 4:18 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Joerg Meier schrieb:
>> Referring to the original poster of a thread as the OP is something that
>> has been around since before there was such a thing as web forums, let
>> alone stackoverflow. But even if it had come from SO, there would
>> still be
>> no reason for your baselessly hostile reaction to a term that is nothing
>> but descriptive, and by no stretch of the imagination could be considered
>> derogatory.
>
> Well you can call an employee working in a bank a clerk,
> or a stewerdess from an airplane, etc..
>
> But why on earth do I use a plain e-mail for posting here?
> Sure not to be called OP.
>
> I don't murne that it is derogartory. It is just lazy
> of OP+1 (i.e. Lew, I am not that lazy) to use OP.

I don't think Lew used OP to save a single keystroke.

It is simply a way to refer to the person that started the
thread without having to consider whether there are multiple
people with the same first name or whether the used name
is really a name etc..

I would prefer to write out "original poster" or use
real name in most cases, but the "OP" is widely used
on usenet.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web