Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "plewto@gmail.com" <plewto@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-12-18 00:13 -0800 |
| Last post | 2012-12-18 22:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 99 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
Need clarification on Object.equals. "plewto@gmail.com" <plewto@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 00:13 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-18 10:39 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-12-18 04:48 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-18 10:56 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2012-12-19 08:13 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 11:22 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 17:43 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 12:06 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-12-19 09:39 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 13:24 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2012-12-19 11:23 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-12-19 08:25 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. plewto@gmail.com - 2012-12-18 10:56 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-12-18 14:24 -0700
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-12-18 13:52 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. markspace <-@.> - 2012-12-18 10:24 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. plewto@gmail.com - 2012-12-18 10:48 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-12-18 14:01 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. plewto@gmail.com - 2012-12-18 12:14 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. plewto@gmail.com - 2012-12-18 12:17 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-18 22:16 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 10:20 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-12-19 03:22 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 12:06 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 09:07 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 09:09 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 14:36 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 09:42 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 15:05 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 16:15 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 15:47 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 16:57 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 16:51 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 18:12 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 17:27 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 11:40 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 10:17 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 15:40 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 10:50 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 17:01 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 10:22 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 18:49 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 11:41 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-19 17:05 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-20 08:34 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-20 07:27 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-20 09:04 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-20 18:10 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-20 11:08 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Dunihơ <Np0eStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-21 07:50 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-21 07:30 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-21 17:09 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Leŵ <lewbl0ch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-23 00:54 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-21 12:23 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-21 17:38 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoj.dk> - 2012-12-23 00:50 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-21 08:39 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-20 13:39 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-21 08:34 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-12-19 09:22 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 15:35 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 10:56 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 17:08 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-19 08:58 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 15:32 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-19 11:08 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 17:32 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-12-19 18:41 +0100
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 18:12 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-19 12:29 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-19 12:00 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 18:06 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 13:13 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-19 07:48 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 16:48 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 12:09 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 17:50 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 13:14 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 18:59 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 13:16 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 19:05 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 11:45 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 20:00 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-19 17:15 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-20 09:22 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-12-20 07:36 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 10:19 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-19 19:16 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-19 11:48 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-12-19 14:12 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 09:04 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-19 13:40 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-20 09:30 +0000
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 12:52 -0800
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-19 09:27 -0600
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-19 10:44 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-18 22:11 -0500
Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-18 22:10 -0500
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-19 10:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9b14d81eeuha7kujsl3rba74vu2oorq9tq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #20537 |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat
<lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
[snip]
>Well you still don't get it do you
>I don't defend insulting behavior but sometimes flesh and blood can
>stand just so much, lets try again. One question at a time.
Why not relax and enjoy the nice USENET?
>You said
>
>"My point is that while newbies do have a "allowed to post
>stupid questions" card"
>
>Who 'allows' them to post stupid questions.
Freedom of speech.
>Do you understand the question
>
>It's a very simple question, really it is. who is it ?
>I really do want to know.
However, freedom of speech does not require the recipient to
listen or to take it seriously. It also allows the recipient to
reply.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-19 18:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gLKdnQqNIsGukU_NnZ2dnUVZ8rmdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20575 |
On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat > <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: [snip] > However, freedom of speech does not require the recipient to > listen or to take it seriously. It also allows the recipient to > reply. Oh a light in the darkness. I couldn't agree more the important bit here of course is It also allows the *recipient* to reply (my accent) I have no problem with the recipient replying, what I object to is the mass rounding on an individual by multiple aggressive responders 'standing up for' people who I am sure are well able to stand up for themselves THIS is unacceptable and I for one will not tolerate it any longer. lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-19 11:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <v164d85h4uhoa25a028irhg2p0mous6030@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #20579 |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat
<lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat
>> <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>> However, freedom of speech does not require the recipient to
>> listen or to take it seriously. It also allows the recipient to
>> reply.
>
>Oh a light in the darkness.
>
>I couldn't agree more the important bit here of course is
>
>It also allows the *recipient* to reply (my accent)
>
>I have no problem with the recipient replying, what I object to is the
>mass rounding on an individual by multiple aggressive responders
>'standing up for' people who I am sure are well able to stand up for
>themselves
>
>THIS is unacceptable and I for one will not tolerate it any longer.
How are you going to do that?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-19 17:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <obryv3jix02r$.tzlkk6pg2u2q$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #20579 |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat wrote: > On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat >> <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > [snip] > >> However, freedom of speech does not require the recipient to >> listen or to take it seriously. It also allows the recipient to >> reply. > > Oh a light in the darkness. > > I couldn't agree more the important bit here of course is > > It also allows the *recipient* to reply (my accent) The "recipient" in this case is each and every person who reads the message. If a person wants to write a private message, to which only that one private recipient of the message may reply, then they should send the message privately. Public messages grant the right of public comment. > I have no problem with the recipient replying, what I object to is the > mass rounding on an individual by multiple aggressive responders > 'standing up for' people who I am sure are well able to stand up for > themselves > > THIS is unacceptable and I for one will not tolerate it any longer. Good riddance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 08:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fb-dnZt0eMEAUE_NnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20612 |
On 20/12/12 01:05, Peter Duniho wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat wrote: > >> On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat >>> <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: [snip] > Public messages grant the right of public comment. Missing the point (again) >> I have no problem with the recipient replying, what I object to is the >> mass rounding on an individual by multiple aggressive responders >> 'standing up for' people who I am sure are well able to stand up for >> themselves >> >> THIS is unacceptable and I for one will not tolerate it any longer. > > Good riddance. Oh dear, one really does have to make things very simple doesn't one. Every time people like you send an aggressive message en-mass I will stick my nose in. As you say public messages grant the right of public comment. Get used to it. lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 07:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9o88pzh3fvhg$.1pztqif8i88dq$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #20618 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:34:35 +0000, lipska the kat wrote: > [...] > Every time people like you send an aggressive message en-mass I will > stick my nose in. In other words, you will do exactly the thing that you are moaning and whining about other people doing. > As you say public messages grant the right of public > comment. Yes, they do. So very odd that you "get it" when it comes to things _you_ post, and yet you are so pitifully clueless about it with it comes to things other people post. > Get used to it. I have been used to the concept of a public forum for quite some time now. I don't have any problem at all with your right to say whatever crazy-ass thing pops into your head, including the kinds of crazy-ass things you have been writing here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 09:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d5h6d8lh74o2ije6d5n7mmdlercb6f1ogp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #20618 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:34:35 +0000, lipska the kat
<lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On 20/12/12 01:05, Peter Duniho wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:40:54 +0000, lipska the kat
>>>> <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>> Public messages grant the right of public comment.
>
>Missing the point (again)
Actually, he has the point quite well. You do not appear to like
this though.
>>> I have no problem with the recipient replying, what I object to is the
>>> mass rounding on an individual by multiple aggressive responders
>>> 'standing up for' people who I am sure are well able to stand up for
>>> themselves
>>>
>>> THIS is unacceptable and I for one will not tolerate it any longer.
> >
>> Good riddance.
>
>Oh dear, one really does have to make things very simple doesn't one.
>
>Every time people like you send an aggressive message en-mass I will
>stick my nose in. As you say public messages grant the right of public
>comment.
Go ahead. Flip your bozo bit.
>Get used to it.
We can outlast you easily.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t66dnW7T2cM8yU7NnZ2dnUVZ8oWdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20631 |
On 20/12/12 17:04, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:34:35 +0000, lipska the kat > <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 20/12/12 01:05, Peter Duniho wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat wrote: >>> >>>> On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote: [snip] >> Get used to it. > > We can outlast you easily. WE can outlast you ... At last, confirmation of a cabal of self-important hypocrites ... as if any were needed. That makes it all worthwhile ... I feel so happy I think I may cut me a hunk of Stilton. I knew you'd slip up eventually. Suck it up Gene, get ready for a bumpy ride. lipska the kat, vindicated, exhilarated and face down in a hunk of cheese. -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 11:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5e9fd30e-83f0-4ad9-8dbe-4dc2eef0f6ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #20633 |
lipska the kat wrote: > At last, confirmation of a cabal of self-important hypocrites ... as if > any were needed. That makes it all worthwhile ... I feel so happy I > think I may cut me a hunk of Stilton. Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. Tsk. Tsk. -- Lew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Dunihơ <Np0eStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 07:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kb14ba$fns$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #20638 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:37 -0800, Lew wrote: 13> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer 13> Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. Who is "Paul", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. 13> Tsk. Tsk. How ironic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 07:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cvz7nkh63lo7$.oyycxky2zlcp.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #20651 |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC), Peter Dunihơ wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:37 -0800, Lew wrote: > > 13> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer > > 13> Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. > > Who is "Paul", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. > > 13> Tsk. Tsk. > > How ironic. Looks like you hit the nail (or the troll) on the head Lew. No reply at all to your message for 12 hours. And then a poorly-forged message under my name, followed shortly by one under Paul's new pseudonym? He's getting better at his trolling, I'll grant him that. I guess we should've seen it coming.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ZPGdnVa4eIp9CknNnZ2dnUVZ7rOdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20656 |
On 21/12/12 15:30, Peter Duniho wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC), Peter Dunihơ wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:37 -0800, Lew wrote: >> >> 13> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer >> >> 13> Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. >> >> Who is "Paul", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. >> >> 13> Tsk. Tsk. >> >> How ironic. > > Looks like you hit the nail (or the troll) on the head Lew. > > No reply at all to your message for 12 hours. And then a poorly-forged > message under my name, followed shortly by one under Paul's new pseudonym? Yea, er what's Pauls new pseudonym ... is it Lew, or is it you, or who ? > He's getting better at his trolling, I'll grant him that. I guess we > should've seen it coming. Yea, so, see ,,, who are we talking about, and who is this Paul geezer. I don't need to nymshift you twat, I am Lipska the Kat Hey that rhymes ... lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leŵ <lewbl0ch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-23 00:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kb5knk$2pb$7@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #20657 |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:09:50 +0000, lipska the kat wrote: 1> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer 1> Yea, er what's Pauls new pseudonym ... is it Lew, or is it you, or 1> who ? Who is "Paul", lipska? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. 1> Yea, so, see ,,, who are we talking about, and who is this Paul geezer. How ironic. 1> I don't need to nymshift you twat, I am Lipska the Kat What does your foul language to do with Java, lipska? 1> Hey that rhymes ... What does rhyming have to do with Java, lipska? > lipska What does your alias have to do with Java, lipska?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 12:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <50d49b08$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| In reply to | #20656 |
On 12/21/2012 10:30 AM, Peter Duniho wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC), Peter Dunihơ wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:37 -0800, Lew wrote: >> >> 13> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer >> >> 13> Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. >> >> Who is "Paul", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. >> >> 13> Tsk. Tsk. >> >> How ironic. > > Looks like you hit the nail (or the troll) on the head Lew. > > No reply at all to your message for 12 hours. And then a poorly-forged > message under my name, followed shortly by one under Paul's new pseudonym? And it was copied to the OS/2 group, which is something also seen before. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 17:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Orydnc8aGMM9A0nNnZ2dnUVZ8nCdnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20658 |
On 21/12/12 17:23, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 12/21/2012 10:30 AM, Peter Duniho wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC), Peter Dunihơ wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:08:37 -0800, Lew wrote: >>> >>> 13> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer >>> >>> 13> Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. >>> >>> Who is "Paul", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that >>> alias. >>> >>> 13> Tsk. Tsk. >>> >>> How ironic. >> >> Looks like you hit the nail (or the troll) on the head Lew. >> >> No reply at all to your message for 12 hours. And then a poorly-forged >> message under my name, followed shortly by one under Paul's new >> pseudonym? > > And it was copied to the OS/2 group, which is something also > seen before. Can somebody *please* tell me who Paul is ... I'm losing the thread here. lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoj.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-23 00:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kb5kgl$2pb$6@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #20656 |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:30:33 -0800, Peter Duniho wrote: 1> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer 1> Looks like you hit the nail (or the troll) on the head Lew. What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with Java, Duniho? 1> No reply at all to your message for 12 hours. What does your classic pontification have to do with Java, Duniho? 1> And then a poorly-forged message under my name, What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Java, Duniho? 1> followed shortly by> one under Paul's new pseudonym? Who is "Paul", Duniho? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. 1> He's getting better at his trolling, I'll grant him that. What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Java, Duniho? 1> I guess we should've seen it coming. What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Java, Duniho?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 08:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pNydnSPo6sXOvUnNnZ2dnUVZ7v2dnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20638 |
On 20/12/12 19:08, Lew wrote: > lipska the kat wrote: >> At last, confirmation of a cabal of self-important hypocrites ... as if >> any were needed. That makes it all worthwhile ... I feel so happy I >> think I may cut me a hunk of Stilton. > > Oh, Paul, Paul, Paul. > > Tsk. Tsk. > I think you may be having trouble with the English again Lew My name is Lipska the Kat, who's this Paul geezer ? Lipska the Kat (in case you missed it last time around). -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-20 13:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <r517d853f8h2e0n0cr2tm79vsl01uebnl6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #20633 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:10:38 +0000, lipska the kat
<lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On 20/12/12 17:04, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:34:35 +0000, lipska the kat
>> <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/12/12 01:05, Peter Duniho wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:49:21 +0000, lipska the kat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/12/12 18:22, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>> Get used to it.
>>
>> We can outlast you easily.
>
>WE can outlast you ...
Yes. More than one person follows this newsgroup.
>At last, confirmation of a cabal of self-important hypocrites ... as if
>any were needed. That makes it all worthwhile ... I feel so happy I
>think I may cut me a hunk of Stilton.
A conspiracy, huh?
Don't you have a world ending shortly to worry about?
>I knew you'd slip up eventually. Suck it up Gene, get ready for a bumpy
>ride.
Are you offering to play pony for me? I do not swing that way.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-21 08:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ybadnd0fMPapgknNnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #20646 |
On 20/12/12 21:39, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:10:38 +0000, lipska the kat > <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 20/12/12 17:04, Gene Wirchenko wrote: [snip] > >> I knew you'd slip up eventually. Suck it up Gene, get ready for a bumpy >> ride. > > Are you offering to play pony for me? I do not swing that way. > Well I'd guess you have tiny little acorn down there Gene so if I did swing that way (whatever 'that way' is) I probably wouldn't be interested anyway. Can we try to elevate the discussion a bit ? Oh look, here's me making an assumption, I'd assumed you were a man but you could just as easily be a mouse. lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-19 09:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <i5udnVnjLKVQRkzNnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #20530 |
lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Who 'allows' them to post stupid questions. > You ? Liberal killfile policies, mostly. It's a self-correcting problem, mostly. -- Leif Roar Moldskred
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web