Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17839 > unrolled thread

Re: hashCode

Started by"Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-odu-this>
First post2012-08-13 19:38 +0000
Last post2012-08-13 19:38 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer


Contents

  Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> - 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000

#17839 — Re: hashCode

From"Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-odu-this>
Date2012-08-13 19:38 +0000
SubjectRe: hashCode
Message-ID<50294F00.56787.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
  To: Lew
From: "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this>

  To: Lew
From: "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this>

  To: Lew
From: Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>

Lew wrote:
> Jan Burse wrote:
>> Maybe it would make sense to spell out what the contract
>> for hashCode() is. Well the contract is simply, the
>> following invariant should hold:
>>
>>     /* invariant that should hold */
>>     if a.equals(b) then a.hashCode()==b.hashCode()
>
> True, but if you read the specification for 'hashCode()' fully, that is not
> the entire contract, only the compiler-enforceable part of it.

Oooops!

I made a mistake.

Not even that is compiler-enforceable.

--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web