Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17069 > unrolled thread

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Wanja Gayk" <wanja.gayk@1:261/38.remove-yy0-this> - 2012-08-03 18:54 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-yy0-this> - 2012-08-03 18:54 +0000
      Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-yy0-this> - 2012-08-03 18:54 +0000
        Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-yy0-this> - 2012-08-03 18:54 +0000

#17069 — Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

  To: Arne Vajhøj
From: Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com>

In article <50109693$0$292$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, arne@vajhoej.dk says...

> > I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
> > naming, etc.  I see no reason to change it for Java.
>
> Maybe not.
>
> But it is still a bad idea.
>
> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.


"You can write FORTRAN in any language."

http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535


Kind regards,
Wanja



--
..Alesi's problem was that the back of the car was jumping up and down 
dangerously - and I can assure you from having been teammate to Jean Alesi and 
knowing what kind of cars that he can pull up with, when Jean Alesi says that a 
car is dangerous - it is. [Jonathan Palmer]

-+- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net
-+-

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#17071

  To: Wanja Gayk
From: Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Wanja Gayk wrote:
> arne@vajhoej.dk  says...
>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>> naming, etc.  I see no reason to change it for Java.
>
>> Maybe not.
>>
>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>
>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.
>
> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>
> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535

Funny, but it ducks the point.

And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.

I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing 
Java.

--
Lew

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17072

  To: Lew
From: Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoej.dk>

On 8/2/2012 7:48 PM, Lew wrote:
> Wanja Gayk wrote:
>> arne@vajhoej.dk  says...
>>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>>> naming, etc.  I see no reason to change it for Java.
>>
>>> Maybe not.
>>>
>>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>>
>>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.
>>
>> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>>
>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535
>
> Funny, but it ducks the point.
>
> And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java
way.
>
> I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing
Java.

Somehow I think you have gotten Wanja and Gene mixed up.

I have no reason to believe that Wanja is anti-"Java best pracice".

In fact I see his post as being definite but subtle pro-"Java best pracice".

Arne

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17074

  To: Arne Vajhøj
From: Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Arne Vajhoj wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> Wanja Gayk wrote:
>>> Arne Vajhoj says...
>>>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>>>> naming, etc.  I see no reason to change it for Java.

>>>> Maybe not.
>>>>
>>>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>>>
>>>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.
>>>
>>> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>>>
>>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535

>> Funny, but it ducks the point.
>>
>> And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java
way.
>>
>> I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing
Java.
>
> Somehow I think you have gotten Wanja and Gene mixed up.

The lack of attributions in the post I answered is what I choose to blame.

Yes, I should have researched the upthread context. So OK, I blame myself.

> I have no reason to believe that Wanja is anti-"Java best pracice".
>
> In fact I see his post as being definite but subtle pro-"Java
> best practice".

I am embarrassed. You are exactly right. I apologize, Wanja.

I missed your point completely.

--
Lew

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web